Editorial illustration for Gemini's New Presentation Tool Fails to Impress, Users Report Slow and Underwhelming Slides
Gemini's One-Prompt Slides Fall Short of Expectations
Gemini adds one-prompt presentation tool, but slides remain lackluster
Google's latest attempt to simplify presentation creation just hit a rough patch. The new Gemini AI tool promised to revolutionize slide-making with a single-prompt interface, but early users are far from impressed.
Generating presentations has long been a time-consuming task, and AI was supposed to change that. But Gemini's new feature seems to have missed the mark, delivering an experience that's more frustrating than helpful.
Tech enthusiasts and professionals alike were hoping for a game-changing solution that could quickly transform text into polished slides. Instead, they're encountering a tool that appears to be more of a beta experiment than a finished product.
Initial reports suggest the presentation generator struggles with basic expectations. Slow production times and uninspired slide designs are already raising eyebrows among early testers.
So what exactly went wrong? Users have been vocal about their disappointment, and the details reveal a tool that falls short of its ambitious promises.
If it's about making good presentation, then probably not. The presentation features of Gemini leave a lot to be expected. From long production times, to lacklustre slides, the wait wasn't worth it.
Here are some of the problems I found during its use: Unless, the task is for the bare minimum likening classroom presentations, Gemini's new presentation feature probably won't come in handy. "Create a presentation with a single prompt" is what they said. Which is true, if you're okay with a placeholder for a presentation.
It's hard for me to realize its benefits, when Gemini fails to create a satisfactory presentation on something as simple as "Apple (fruit)". I'd advise sticking to its alternatives, till its performance improves. If it's a capstone for what's to follow, then it's a step in the right direction.
Hopefully its performance appreciates with time, just like it did with nano banana. Yes, but expect a draft, not a polished deck. It's useful for starting points, not final slides.
In testing, it created slides unrelated to the source document. Right now, Gemini outputs an HTML version of slides. It doesn't properly export to PPT or PDF yet, which limits usability.
It trails behind options like Gamma and ChatGPT in slide structure, depth, and context understanding. It's best for quick placeholders or school-level slides. For polished, client-ready decks, choose other tools until Gemini matures.
Gemini's new presentation tool seems to fall short of expectations. Users report frustratingly slow slide generation and uninspired visual results that barely meet basic presentation standards.
The tool's promise of creating presentations with a single prompt rings hollow. While technically functional, it appears more suited to rudimentary classroom-level slides rather than professional or creative work.
Performance issues plague the feature. Long production times combined with lackluster slide designs suggest the tool is still in an early, unpolished state. For users seeking efficient, high-quality presentation creation, Gemini's current offering likely won't satisfy.
The fundamental problem isn't just technical limitations. The slides themselves seem underwhelming - suggesting the AI struggles to translate prompts into compelling visual narratives. What should be a time-saving idea instead feels like a half-baked experiment.
For now, Gemini's presentation tool appears more of a novelty than a serious productivity aid. Users wanting polished, impactful slides might want to wait for significant improvements. The current version seems better suited to basic, low-stakes presentations where minimal effort is acceptable.
Related Reading
Browse all Google news →
LLMs & Generative AI Ant Group unveils Ring-1T, first open-source trillion-parameter reasoning model
LLMs & Generative AI ChatGPT Health Event Shows AI Modernizing Dev Workflows, GitLab Unveils Plans
LLMs & Generative AI Gen AI app sessions up fivefold, downloads jump 778% as ChatGPT leads traffic
Related Topic Google AI Advisors Let Users Probe Performance with Conversational “Why” Queries
Research & Benchmarks
Related Topic Game stocks slide as Google launches AI world‑gen tool, Project Genie limits noted
Market Trends
From Archives AI handles tasks; humans lead vision, keep team ties, guide uncertainty
From Archives Brumby-14B-Base Qwen3 variant uses Power Retention, avoids full training cost
From Archives Google plans space-based TPUs for solar-powered data centres, preprint says
Research & Benchmarks
From Archives Google applies AI principles to boost nature protection and restoration
Policy & Regulation
Common Questions Answered
What specific performance issues are users experiencing with Gemini's new presentation tool?
Users are reporting extremely long production times when generating slides, which significantly delays the presentation creation process. The tool's slide outputs are described as uninspired and barely meeting basic presentation standards, making it less useful for professional or creative work.
How does Gemini's AI presentation tool compare to creating slides manually?
According to user feedback, the Gemini presentation tool currently seems more suited to basic classroom-level presentations rather than professional-grade slides. The tool's single-prompt interface promises convenience, but the actual results are underwhelming, potentially making manual slide creation a more efficient option.
What limitations have users identified in Gemini's presentation generation feature?
Users have highlighted multiple limitations, including frustratingly slow slide generation times and visually unimpressive slide designs. The tool appears to produce placeholder-level content that lacks the sophistication and polish expected from an AI-powered presentation creation tool.