GitHub Copilot, Claude, and Google’s Jules become autonomous coding agents
When I opened a fresh repo this spring, GitHub Copilot, Claude and Google’s Jules didn’t just finish my lines - they started suggesting whole functions, test suites and even code-review comments. They claim they can plan, build, test and explain what they’re doing while I keep an eye on the overall design. It feels a bit like having a junior dev who talks through each step.
That matters because we no longer have to click through every single edit. The shift toward asynchronous, self-directed agents brings up a lot of questions - will they fit into our pipelines, and can we trust the choices they make? The vendors are calling them “coding agents,” able to take on routine chores that used to eat up hours.
In practice, the tools are moving from helper to collaborator. Still, true autonomy is probably limited by how well the agents can understand the problem and spell out their reasoning. It’s an interesting evolution, not a full-blown replacement of developers.
Over the past year, tools like GitHub Copilot, Claude, and Google’s Jules have evolved from autocomplete assistants into coding agents that can plan, build, test, and even review code asynchronously. Instead of waiting for you to drive every step, they can now act on instructions, explain their reasoning, and push working code back to your repo. The shift is subtle but important: AI is no longer just helping you write code; it’s learning how to work alongside you.
With the right approach, these systems can save hours in your day by handling the repetitive, mechanical aspects of development, allowing you to focus on architecture, logic, and decisions that truly require human judgment. In this article, we’ll examine five AI-assisted coding techniques that save significant time without compromising quality, ranging from feeding design documents directly into models to pairing two AIs as coder and reviewer. Each one is simple enough to adopt today, and together they form a smarter, faster development workflow.
# Technique 1: Letting AI Read Your Design Docs Before You Code One of the easiest ways to get better results from coding models is to stop giving them isolated prompts and start giving them context.
Will these new coding agents actually replace human oversight? I’m not sure. In the last year GitHub Copilot, Claude and Google’s Jules have moved past plain autocomplete - they can now plan, build, test and even review code without waiting for a developer to type a command.
That seems to hit the annoying loops of setup, review and re-work that many of us complain about. Still, most programmers already type fast enough, so raw speed isn’t the biggest win. The real hook is the promise of asynchronous help that follows instructions and can explain why it did something.
The five techniques the article lists are meant to trim time from repetitive chores, but the actual effect will hinge on how well the agents cope with complex, domain-specific logic. It’s unclear whether a team will trust an AI’s review as much as a colleague’s. As the tools get smarter, we’ll probably end up with new workflows, yet the size of any productivity boost is still up for debate.
For now the shift is obvious, even if we’re still figuring out its practical limits.
Further Reading
- GitHub Copilot Vs Google: AI Coding Performance Revealed - Empathy First Media
- Claude Code vs OpenAI Codex vs GitHub Copilot vs Google Jules: The Ultimate AI Coding Assistant Showdown in 2025 - Empathy First Media
- 5 AI-Assisted Coding Techniques Guaranteed to Save You Time - KDnuggets
- The Rise of Coding Agents: A Comparative Analysis - Wyeworks Blog
- I tested the top 5 OpenAI Codex alternatives in 2025 - eesel Blog
More in AI Tools & Apps
Google and Replit grapple with reliable AI agents as users demand creative loops
Google and Replit are both wrestling with a problem that’s becoming familiar across the AI...
Odisha teams with OpenAI to train students and officials in AI
Odisha’s new partnership with OpenAI marks a rare direct link between a state government and a...
Meta adds Spotify AI music, Kannada/Telugu, and noise filtering to AI Glasses
Meta’s latest firmware push for its AI‑powered glasses does more than tighten up audio clarity.
LG's recent webOS update adds Microsoft Copilot app, now removable
Why does this matter for anyone who bought an LG TV this year? In January, LG and Samsung said they...
Microsoft defends holiday Copilot ad amid claims its actions are simulated
Why does the holiday Copilot spot matter? While the ad rolls out slick visuals of the AI drafting...
Common Questions Answered
How have GitHub Copilot, Claude, and Google's Jules evolved beyond basic autocomplete functionality?
These tools have transformed from simple code-completion helpers into autonomous coding agents that can plan, build, test, and even review code without waiting for developer prompts. They now operate asynchronously, acting on instructions and explaining their reasoning while developers focus on higher-level tasks.
What specific capabilities do these new autonomous coding agents possess according to the article?
The coding agents can plan, build, test, and review code autonomously, pushing working code back to repositories without requiring step-by-step guidance. They operate asynchronously and can explain their reasoning, representing a significant shift from traditional autocomplete functionality to true collaborative partnership.
What is the primary benefit of these autonomous coding agents beyond just typing speed?
The main advantage addresses the setup, review, and rework loops that developers identify as major bottlenecks in their workflow. Since most programmers already type quickly, the real gain comes from eliminating these repetitive cycles rather than simply increasing coding speed.
How does the article characterize the relationship between developers and these new coding agents?
The relationship has evolved from AI merely helping write code to learning how to work alongside developers as collaborative partners. This shift allows developers to focus on the bigger picture while the agents handle detailed implementation tasks autonomously.