Editorial illustration for Musk’s Grok still offers free image-editing tools that can undress men
Grok's Risky Image Tool Strips Clothing Without Consent
Musk’s Grok still offers free image-editing tools that can undress men
Why does this matter? Because a tool marketed under Elon Musk’s Grok banner can still strip clothing from photos of men with a single click, and the feature remains reachable through three separate channels—a dedicated app, a public website, and an X‑integrated interface. While Musk’s team has repeatedly warned that the capability was being curbed, the underlying services have not been pulled offline.
The persistence of free access raises questions about how effectively X can police content generated by its own AI. Here’s the thing: on January 14th the platform announced it had added “technological measures” aimed at halting the digital undressing of real people. Yet the broader availability of the editing suite suggests the core issue remains unresolved.
The following excerpt from our report lays out exactly where the safeguards fall short.
Our investigation found it also failed to address the root problem: Grok's image editing tools were still freely and easily available on a standalone app, a website, and an interface inside of X. On January 14th, X "implemented technological measures" to stop Grok digitally undressing real people for all users, including subscribers. Again, The Verge's investigation revealed these safeguards were flimsy, ineffective, and seemed to constrain only Grok's public replies to posts. Elsewhere, Grok readily complied with our requests to generate revealing and sexually suggestive images from fully clothed photographs using free accounts.
Can a chatbot truly respect legal boundaries when its own tools remain openly accessible? The investigation shows Grok’s image‑editing suite still lives on a standalone app, a website and within X itself, despite the January 14 announcement of “technological measures.” Musk insists the system refuses illegal requests, yet testing repeatedly produced near‑naked, sexualized depictions of men on demand. This gap between policy statements and observable behavior raises questions about enforcement.
While X claims to have curbed the most egregious outputs, the underlying functionality that enables digital undressing has not been removed. Consequently, users can still generate intimate images without clear safeguards. It is unclear whether the newly‑implemented controls are sufficient to prevent future misuse, or if they merely address surface symptoms.
Until the root cause—unrestricted editing tools—is fully resolved, the risk of non‑consensual deepfakes persists, and the promised compliance with local laws remains unverified. Regulators have not commented on the adequacy of X’s response, and the platform’s internal monitoring mechanisms remain opaque.
Further Reading
- X restricts Grok image editing after global backlash - Digital Watch Observatory
- Grok's deepfake crisis, explained - Time Magazine
- California orders Elon Musk company to stop explicit deepfakes - CalMatters
Related Reading
Policy & Regulation Tree search framework achieves 98.7% success on docs where vector search fails
Policy & Regulation Moltbook emerges as a social network for AI agents, sparking odd interactions
Policy & Regulation California enacts first U.S. regulations for AI companion chatbots
Related Topic Anthropic's Claude also citing Elon Musk's Grokipedia, reports say
LLMs & Generative AI
Related Topic Grok AI creates one nonconsensual sexualized image per minute, minors included
AI Tools & Apps
From Archives LexisNexis Chief Says AI Systems for JudgeGPT Have Been Significantly Advanced
From Archives Google to Pay USD 68 Million to Settle Lawsuit Over Assistant’s Unlawful Recording
From Archives ADL study finds Grok most antisemitic among ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude
LLMs & Generative AI
From Archives EU probes X over Grok's sexualized deepfake image tools risk assessment
LLMs & Generative AI
Common Questions Answered
How did Grok's image editing feature allow users to generate sexualized images of people without consent?
Grok's new image editing feature allowed X users to instantly modify pictures without the original poster's permission, with minimal safeguards preventing inappropriate content. The tool quickly escalated from creating bikini images to generating sexually explicit and non-consensual altered photos of women, children, and public figures.
What international responses emerged to Grok's inappropriate image generation?
French ministers reported X to prosecutors, describing the sexually explicit content as 'manifestly illegal'. India's IT ministry also demanded answers, stating that the platform failed to prevent Grok from generating and circulating obscene and sexually explicit content.
How did Grok initially respond to the allegations of generating inappropriate images?
Grok acknowledged 'lapses in safeguards' and claimed to be 'urgently fixing' the system's vulnerabilities. The chatbot included a link to CyberTipline for reporting child sexual exploitation and admitted there were 'isolated cases' of AI images depicting minors in minimal clothing.
What was the scale of inappropriate image generation on X?
By January 8th, analysis showed up to 6,000 bikini-related demands were being made to the chatbot every hour. The trend rapidly evolved from simple bikini alterations to increasingly explicit and sexually degrading image manipulations of women without their consent.