Editorial illustration for NYT and other outlets sue Brave over alleged content scraping
NYT Sues Brave Browser for AI Training Content Scraping
NYT and other outlets sue Brave over alleged content scraping
The New York Times filed suit against Brave Software on Monday in federal court in Manhattan, accusing the privacy-focused browser maker of scraping its copyrighted articles and funneling them to AI companies including Anthropic, Perplexity, Mistral, xAI, and Cohere. A second lawsuit, brought the same day by the Daily News, the Chicago Tribune, and the Orlando Sentinel, makes similar claims against the company.
Brave, founded in 2015 and backed by roughly $250 million in funding, built its reputation on blocking trackers and ads for users. The Times suit says that business model crossed a line: Brave allegedly assembled an index of more than 30 billion webpages using a crawler it hasn't identified, one publishers had no way to block. The complaint also points to a browser feature that gets around paywalls, plus Brave's practice of stripping out publishers' ads while inserting its own.
This isn't the Times' first run at the AI supply chain. The paper has already sued OpenAI and Perplexity over similar allegations. Now it wants an injunction against Brave and damages for what it calls unlawful distribution of its work. Brave hadn't responded to a request for comment by publication time.
“In this way, Brave acts both like a burglar that misappropriates the content of publishers, and an AI ‘fence’ that sells stolen content to third parties,” the suit reads. It says Brave built an index of more than 30 billion webpages using an unidentified crawler, leaving publishers unable to block it.
Why this matters
Brave built its brand on blocking trackers and ads, selling itself as the browser that respects publishers and users alike. This suit argues the opposite: that its Leo assistant and search tools scraped Times content and piped it to five AI companies named in the complaint, Anthropic, Perplexity, Mistral, xAI, and Cohere, turning a privacy tool into a supply line for model training and retrieval. For founders building on scraped web data, the lesson is that "privacy-focused" branding doesn't buy legal cover on copyright, and that downstream customers can get named alongside the scraper.
For researchers and companies licensing content for RAG pipelines, this is another data point showing publishers are done tolerating ambiguity about where training and retrieval data comes from. The Daily News, Chicago Tribune, and Orlando Sentinel filing the same day, in the same Manhattan court, signals coordinated legal pressure rather than one outlet's grievance. Anyone building products that touch scraped publisher content should expect their vendor contracts and data pipelines to get scrutinized next, not just the browser doing the scraping.
Related Reading
Policy & Regulation Akamai Proposes SAFE Cybersecurity Guidelines for AI Threats
Policy & Regulation After ditching AI fitness apps and a Fitbit, I return to Peloton classes
Policy & Regulation Sony Music, Warner Chappell Sue Anthropic Over "Blatant Theft
From Archives NYT and other publications sue Brave over alleged AI scraping, paywall bypass
From Archives WebAnything Tool Collects Web Data, Verifies for Agent Development
Common Questions Answered
What specific allegations does the New York Times make against Brave in its lawsuit?
The New York Times accuses Brave Software of scraping its copyrighted articles and funneling them to AI companies including Anthropic, Perplexity, Mistral, xAI, and Cohere. According to the suit, Brave built an index of more than 30 billion webpages using an unidentified crawler that publishers cannot block, acting as both a content thief and an AI 'fence' that sells stolen content to third parties.
Which other news outlets filed similar lawsuits against Brave on the same day?
The Daily News, the Chicago Tribune, and the Orlando Sentinel filed a second lawsuit against Brave on the same day as the New York Times suit, making similar claims about content scraping and unauthorized distribution to AI companies.
How does Brave's alleged content scraping contradict its brand positioning?
Brave built its reputation as a privacy-focused browser that blocks trackers and ads while respecting publishers and users. However, the lawsuit argues that Brave's Leo assistant and search tools actually scraped publisher content and piped it to AI companies, transforming the privacy tool into a supply line for model training and retrieval rather than a protector of content.
What is Brave Software's funding background and founding date?
Brave was founded in 2015 and has been backed by approximately $250 million in funding, establishing itself as a well-capitalized competitor in the browser market before facing these content scraping allegations.
Further Reading
- New York Times and other outlets sue web browser Brave over alleged content scraping - TechCrunch
- New York Times sues maker of Brave web browser over copyrights - Reuters
- The New York Times and other publications sue Brave web browser for AI scraping and bypassing paywalls - The Verge
- New York Times and three other US papers sue Brave over AI scraping - The Next Web
- Brave faces US infringement, circumvention claims for AI copying from New York Times - MLex
