After ditching AI fitness apps and a Fitbit, I return to Peloton classes
The surge of AI‑powered workout assistants has turned many home gyms into data‑driven command centers. Apps promise personalized pacing, predictive fatigue alerts and real‑time form corrections, while wearables track every heartbeat, stride and calorie. For a while, the author treated each new algorithm like a personal trainer, tweaking settings, feeding metrics and chasing ever‑tighter performance targets.
The result? A schedule that felt less like a routine and more like a series of prompts to satisfy a machine. When the constant stream of recommendations started to eclipse the pleasure of moving, the decision was made to step back.
By stripping away the Fitbit and pausing the experimental apps, the writer reclaimed the space between intention and action. Peloton remained—a familiar platform, but its AI overlays were deliberately ignored. What follows captures the moment of recalibration, shifting focus from quantifiable gains to the simple act of enjoying the ride.
I was spending so much time coaching various AI tools on how to coach me that I'd begun dreading my workouts. I took off my Fitbit and hit pause on testing. And while I still used Peloton for classes, I ignored the AI features. I readjusted my mindset from improving my 5K time to simply enjoying the
I was spending so much time coaching various AI tools on how to coach me that I'd begun dreading my workouts. I took off my Fitbit and hit pause on testing. And while I still used Peloton for classes, I ignored the AI features.
I readjusted my mindset from improving my 5K time to simply enjoying the race day energy. On race day, I barely looked at my watch the entire time. I had no idea what my splits were, but I was proud that I didn't need to take any walk breaks despite the hillier course.
According to my Apple Watch, I finished in 36 minutes. That was five minutes faster than my Turkey Trot, and with a quicker average pace than all the other runs during my AI fitness testing.
Did the AI coach ever help? Not really, though. After weeks of tweaking digital trainers, the author finally removed the Fitbit, paused every AI‑driven test, and decided to rely solely on the unembellished Peloton experience, hoping the simplicity would restore motivation.
The result? A return to plain‑vanilla Peloton classes, stripped of any algorithmic prompts. By ignoring the AI suggestions, the workouts stopped feeling like chores and began to feel like choices.
The shift from chasing a faster 5K to simply enjoying the ride marks a clear change in mindset, indicating that the author values personal satisfaction over performance metrics. Still, the piece notes that this relief is personal; it doesn’t claim the same will work for everyone. The narrative suggests that, for this writer, an AI coach acted more as a distraction than a motivator.
Whether other users will find similar freedom remains unclear. In the end, the experiment underscores a modest point: sometimes the simplest tools, used without their high‑tech add‑ons, may be enough to keep moving. The author plans to keep the AI features off, focusing on the class rhythm and personal enjoyment rather than data.
Further Reading
- The Peloton Paradox: Why Human Instructors Still Matter in an AI-Optimized Fitness World - TechCrunch
- AI Wants to Be Your Personal Trainer. Gym-Goers Aren’t So Sure - Wired
- From Wearables to Workouts: How Fitness Apps Are Using Your Biometric Data - The Verge
- Why Some Athletes Are Turning Off Their Trackers and Going Back to Instructor-Led Classes - The New York Times
- Regulating the Quantified Self: Policy Challenges of AI-Driven Fitness Platforms - arXiv
More in Policy & Regulation
Congress adds energy provisions to defense bill to spur advanced reactors
Why does a defense bill suddenly matter to the power grid? While the National Defense Authorization...
Spain mandates AI‑generated dashboards, reports, and slides be labeled
Spain has moved from discussion to enforcement, demanding transparency for every piece of analysis...
Living policy records bring real‑time AI ethics visibility across departments
The 2026 outlook for AI ethics and governance is shifting from paper‑based rulebooks to dynamic,...
Google Translate adds real‑time speech translation to any headphones
Google’s latest update to its translation service expands the reach of spoken‑language assistance...
Trump signs executive order threatening to punish states that pass AI laws
President Donald Trump signed an executive order this week that threatens to withhold federal funds...
Common Questions Answered
Why did the author decide to stop using AI‑powered workout assistants and their Fitbit?
The author felt that constantly coaching the AI tools turned workouts into chores, leading to dread. Removing the Fitbit and pausing AI tests allowed a mental shift from performance metrics to pure enjoyment.
How did ignoring the AI features in Peloton classes affect the author's race‑day experience?
By ignoring AI prompts, the author ran the race without checking splits or watches, yet managed to avoid walk breaks. This fostered a sense of pride in relying on instinct rather than data‑driven guidance.
What specific AI functionalities did the author find unhelpful in the fitness apps?
The AI‑powered assistants promised personalized pacing, predictive fatigue alerts, and real‑time form corrections, but the author found these prompts intrusive. Ultimately, they were ineffective at improving motivation or performance.
What outcome did the author experience after returning to plain‑vanilla Peloton classes?
Stripping away algorithmic prompts restored the author’s motivation, turning workouts back into choices rather than chores. The experience reinforced the belief that simplicity can be more sustainable than constant data tracking.