Skip to main content
Meta engineers testing advanced AI model GPT-5.5, codenamed "Watermelon," in a high-tech lab with futuristic servers and glow

Editorial illustration for Meta Tests GPT-5.5 With 'Watermelon' Model

Meta Tests GPT-5.5 With 'Watermelon' Model

2 min read

Meta's Muse Spark model launched in April to a shrug. Industry read: usable, but nowhere near frontier. Three months on, chief AI officer Alexandr Wang says the follow-up has closed that gap entirely.

The model goes by the internal codename "Watermelon," and Wang is telling people it performs on par with OpenAI's GPT-5.5. That's a big jump for a company whose last public release drew the verdict "not great, but back in the game." Wang has also teased an upcoming coding model he compares to Anthropic's Opus tier, Anthropic's top-of-line coding product and a benchmark rivals treat as the one to beat.

None of this happens in a vacuum. OpenAI isn't pausing development while Meta trains its next release, and GPT-5.5 itself won't be the finish line for long. But Meta has sunk roughly $145 billion into its AI buildout, and until now the return on that spending has been hard to see in the actual products. Wang's claims, if they hold up once Watermelon ships, would mark the first sign that the money is translating into something the rest of the field has to reckon with.

Meta superintelligence chief Alexandr Wang just reportedly told employees that Watermelon, the model the company is currently training, has matched GPT-5.5, with the company gearing up for the next update to its Muse Spark AI.

Why this matters

Codenames like "Watermelon" are the closest thing we get to a real signal before a launch, and the fact that Meta is reportedly benchmarking it directly against GPT-5.5 tells us where the company thinks it stands. For developers building on Llama or considering it, that's worth watching closely: a head-to-head test against OpenAI's frontier model suggests Meta believes it's closer to parity than its last few releases implied. For founders, this is another reminder that the model you build around today could be outclassed in a quarter, so architecture choices that assume long-term stability in any one provider are riskier than they look.

Researchers should treat "Watermelon" as unconfirmed until Meta actually ships something with real benchmarks attached, not marketing language. We'd caution against reading too much into a leaked codename, but the pattern of Meta testing against OpenAI's newest release, rather than its own prior models, is the part worth tracking as this plays out over the coming weeks.

LIVE14:38New Research Shows Why Agent Rankings Change After Accounting for Competition