DOE orders cloud, labs, and network integration for AI Genesis mission in 90 days
Last week the DOE announced what officials are calling the Genesis mission - a rush to cobble together the computing power needed for a new AI-driven research push. The idea of a single, nation-wide AI platform has been tossed around for years, but this is the first time the agency has actually set a hard deadline. In the next three months they plan to line up cloud services, storage arrays and the high-performance networks that live inside the national labs.
After that, there’s about a month to pick which data sets and models get the first run, then a final sprint to see if the labs can actually handle the load. It seems to mark a move away from scattered projects toward a more coordinated effort, something that could speed up discoveries in a handful of fields. The exact milestones are laid out in the statement that follows.
The order tells the DOE Secretary to identify and stitch together computing, storage and networking resources - cloud-based systems and lab assets - within 90 days. By day 120, the Secretary must put forward a portfolio of initial data and model assets; by day 240, review lab capabiliti
The order directs the DOE Secretary to identify and integrate computing, storage, and networking resources, including cloud-based systems and national laboratories within 90 days. By 120 days, the Secretary must propose a portfolio of initial data and model assets; by 240 days, review lab capabilities for AI-augmented research; and within 270 days, establish a working prototype of the platform for at least one national science challenge. More than two dozen "science and technology challenges" have been identified for the mission, including areas such as advanced manufacturing, biotechnology, critical materials, nuclear energy, quantum information science, and microelectronics.
President Donald Trump has assigned overall leadership of the mission to the assistant to the president for science and technology (APST), who will coordinate interagency efforts through the National Science & Technology Council (NSTC). The APST is also tasked with guiding strategy, funding prizes, and establishing partnerships with national laboratories, universities, and private-sector entities. Genesis is expected to mobilise America's research and development assets including DOE labs, academic institutions, and major technology companies to train scientific foundation models and build agentic AI that can "test new hypotheses" and "automate research workflows." The mission explicitly aims to "dramatically accelerate scientific discovery, strengthen national security, strengthen energy dominance … and multiply the return on taxpayer investment," the order declares.
In addition, the order establishes new mechanisms for external collaboration and funding: it calls for cooperative R&D agreements, prize competitions, and standardised data- and model-sharing frameworks. It also outlines rules for data governance, IP licensing, export controls, and security approvals. "We will harness … the world's largest collection of scientific datasets … to train scientific foundation models and create AI agents to test new hypotheses, automate research workflows, and accelerate scientific breakthroughs," the order reads.
The order tells the DOE Secretary to pull together cloud, storage and networking assets, including national-lab systems, within three months, then sketch a first batch of data and model assets by day 120, and finally gauge lab capabilities by day 240. That pace feels a lot like the rush of past national projects, yet the article skips over how the real-world integration headaches might be tackled. The plan leans on the government’s huge research datasets and high-performance computing muscle, hoping to reshape America’s scientific backbone and keep us ahead in tech.
Still, it’s hard to say whether the 90-day window really accounts for stitching together different cloud platforms, aging lab setups and the maze of security rules. The White House paints a picture of a sweeping, coordinated push, but details on funding, governance and concrete milestones are missing, leaving a lot of uncertainty. As the 90-day clock starts ticking, the next moves will show if the Genesis Mission can shift from lofty statements to actual, measurable results.
Related Reading
Research & Benchmarks Consensus uses GPT-5 and Responses API to speed scientific research
Research & Benchmarks Developers say Sora, unlike Vine/TikTok, is not about people in social media
Research & Benchmarks Google AI Advisors Let Users Probe Performance with Conversational “Why” Queries
Common Questions Answered
What specific deadline does the DOE order set for integrating cloud, storage, and networking resources for the AI Genesis mission?
The order requires the DOE Secretary to identify and integrate all computing, storage, and networking resources—including cloud‑based systems and national‑lab infrastructure—within 90 days. This three‑month sprint marks the first phase of the Genesis mission’s integration effort.
By what date must the DOE propose an initial portfolio of data and model assets for the Genesis mission?
The DOE must present a portfolio of initial data and model assets by the 120‑day mark after the order is issued. This proposal follows the 90‑day integration deadline and sets the foundation for AI‑augmented research.
What are the milestones outlined for the DOE after the 120‑day data portfolio, specifically at the 240‑day and 270‑day points?
At 240 days, the Secretary must review laboratory capabilities for AI‑augmented research, assessing how labs can support the mission. By 270 days, a working prototype of the national AI platform must be established to tackle at least one major science challenge.
How does the article describe the feasibility of the 90‑day integration deadline for the Genesis mission?
The article questions whether the 90‑day deadline is realistic, noting that while the timeline is ambitious, the piece provides no details on how integration hurdles will be overcome. It highlights the urgency of the project but leaves the practical challenges unaddressed.