Editorial illustration for Pentagon AI team led by Pete Hegseth adds ex‑Uber exec, PE billionaire
Hegseth Confronts Anthropic Over Military AI Limits
Pentagon AI team led by Pete Hegseth adds ex‑Uber exec, PE billionaire
Pete Hegseth’s new Pentagon AI outfit reads like a boardroom roll call rather than a typical military task force. Alongside a former Uber executive, the team now lists a private‑equity billionaire whose portfolio spans everything from logistics to fintech. The hires signal a shift toward pulling seasoned industry players into the defense fold, a move that has drawn eyebrows in Washington.
While the roster itself is noteworthy, the real test comes when the group steps into the trenches of policy disputes that have simmered for months. Hegseth recently convened a meeting that included several senior Defense officials—a detail that, according to Axios, was meant to underline the Pentagon’s commitment to handling the controversy with weight. In a post‑DOGE Trump administration run by broligarchs, it’s always worthwhile to check the attendees’…
In a post-meeting readout, Axios reported that Hegseth brought several other senior Defense officials to the meeting in an attempt to show that the Pentagon was taking the dispute "seriously." But in a post-DOGE Trump administration run by broligarchs, it's always worthwhile to check the attendees' bios. Some of them were normal senior officials who'd spent their careers in government and military work, but the others have somewhat unusual backgrounds: - Pentagon CTO Emil Michael, who we reported has been spearheading negotiations with Anthropic. Michael may be familiar to longtime Verge readers and followers of Silicon Valley corporate drama as the former second-in-command at Uber when Travis Kalanick was CEO.
Michael was pushed out in 2017 after an investigation found that he, and several other top executives that called themselves the "A-Team," perpetuated a culture of sexual harassment at the company. - For anyone curious about his history on surveillance: During a 2014 dinner with several journalists, Michael suggested that Uber hire opposition researchers to gather personal "dirt" on reporters publishing unfavorable news, suggesting that he'd wanted to target one female reporter who had recently criticized the company for its culture of misogyny. This was also around the time that Uber drew controversy for an internal tool known as "God Mode," which employees used to track the movements of its users, including one BuzzFeed journalist who was writing about an Uber executive.
- Deputy Secretary Steve Feinberg, the founder of the private equity firm Cerberus Capital Management, which manages roughly $65 billion in assets and specializes in "distressed properties." Feinberg, who's widely blamed for the death of the auto manufacturer Chrysler, was also an early supporter of Donald Trump, donating to his 2016 presidential campaign and serving on the president's intelligence advisory board in 2018.
What does a Pentagon AI team that mixes a former Uber executive with a private‑equity billionaire really achieve? The roster, highlighted in Regulator’s subscriber‑only briefing, also lists defense heavyweight Steve Feinberg of Cerberus Capital Management, suggesting a blend of tech and finance expertise. Axios notes that Hegseth invited several senior defense officials to a recent meeting, a move meant to signal that the department is taking the dispute “seriously.” Yet the same report hints that, in a post‑DOGE Trump administration described as run by “broligarchs,” the composition of such gatherings warrants scrutiny.
Because the article offers no detail on the team’s concrete objectives or outcomes, it’s unclear whether the mix of corporate and investment backgrounds will translate into effective AI policy or merely serve as a symbolic gesture. The presence of high‑profile names may lend credibility, but without transparent metrics the actual impact remains uncertain. As the Pentagon continues to navigate AI‑related disputes, observers will likely watch the attendees’ roles closely, hoping for more substantive evidence of progress.
Further Reading
- Pentagon gives Anthropic Friday ultimatum on military AI restrictions - Fox News
- Hegseth Encourages DOD Personnel to Use AI - Defense Communities
- Papers with Code - Latest NLP Research - Papers with Code
- Hugging Face Daily Papers - Hugging Face
- ArXiv CS.CL (Computation and Language) - ArXiv
Common Questions Answered
What ultimatum did Pete Hegseth give to Anthropic's CEO regarding AI technology?
Hegseth gave Anthropic's CEO Dario Amodei a Friday deadline to open the company's AI technology for unrestricted military use or risk losing its government contract. Pentagon officials warned they could designate Anthropic a supply chain risk or use the Defense Production Act to force broader access to their AI products.
What ethical concerns has Anthropic's CEO expressed about military AI use?
Dario Amodei has repeatedly voiced concerns about unchecked government use of AI, specifically highlighting the dangers of fully autonomous armed drones and AI-assisted mass surveillance that could track dissent. In a recent essay, he warned about the potential for AI to monitor billions of conversations and detect and suppress potential disloyalty.
What specific lines has Anthropic refused to cross in military AI applications?
Anthropic has established two key ethical boundaries: they will not allow fully autonomous military targeting operations and will not support domestic surveillance of U.S. citizens. The Pentagon objects to these restrictions, arguing that military operations require tools without built-in limitations.