ChatGPT lists Garmin Vivoactive 5, Fitbit Versa 4, Pixel Watch 3, Ticwatch Pro 5
When I asked ChatGPT to narrow down a smartwatch purchase, the bot produced a concise shortlist of current devices, then followed up with a handful of deal links. It didn’t just throw out brand names; it broke down battery endurance, which apps run natively, price points, and even suggested the primary use case for each model. The response felt more like a quick‑fire comparison chart than a vague recommendation, and the list included a Garmin model, a Fitbit, a Google offering, and a Ticwatch.
While the selection covered the major players in the market, the format raised a question: how well does an AI‑driven assistant handle the nuances of personal tech shopping, and does it stay current enough to be useful? The details that followed illustrate exactly what the bot presented, and why that matters for anyone relying on AI for everyday buying decisions.
Afterward, it gave me a few links to deals on the top watch it suggested, the Garmin Vivoactive 5. The Fitbit Versa 4, Google Pixel Watch 3, and Ticwatch Pro 5 were also in ChatGPT's recommendations for me. It was able to compare battery life, app compatibility, prices, and "best for" use cases for each, like "daily use," "budget friendly," or "strong Android integration." I wouldn't normally turn to AI for help shopping for tech, but I can see how a feature like this could be useful to someone who isn't sure what they're looking for or where to start.
Did the AI really understand what I wanted? The assistants suggested the Garmin Vivoactive 5, Fitbit Versa 4, Pixel Watch 3, and Ticwatch Pro 5, all models released a year or more ago. While they could compare battery life, app compatibility, prices, and “best for” use cases, the recommendations ignored newer options like the Pixel Watch 4 or Vivoactive 6 that I originally considered.
It’s clear the new shopping features from OpenAI, Google, Perplexity, and Microsoft can pull data quickly, yet the timeliness of that data appears questionable. The links provided led to deals on the top suggested watch, the Vivoactive 5, which may or may not align with a buyer’s latest preferences. Without explicit confirmation that the list reflects the current market, users might still need to double‑check specifications themselves.
In practice, the tools offered a convenient side‑by‑side comparison, but their reliance on older product listings suggests room for improvement. Whether future updates will address this lag remains uncertain, and shoppers should stay aware of possible gaps.
Further Reading
- Papers with Code - Latest NLP Research - Papers with Code
- Hugging Face Daily Papers - Hugging Face
- ArXiv CS.CL (Computation and Language) - ArXiv
More in Business & Startups
White House launches Genesis Mission to unite supercomputers, data in AI platform
The White House has rolled out a new effort called the Genesis Mission, a federal push to stitch...
Microsoft launches Fara-7B, an agentic Qwen model that solves tasks in ~16 steps
Microsoft rolled out Fara‑7B this week, branding it as an “agentic” model designed to handle...
Karpathy's weekend ‘vibe code’ hack highlights AI orchestration layer
Why does a weekend experiment matter to the boardroom? Andrej Karpathy posted a terse script he...
DHL, early AI adopter, rolls out HappyRobot agents to automate global operations
DHL has been testing AI tools for years, but this spring the company moved from pilots to a...
Nano Banana Pro offers 4 free high‑res images; plans start Rs 975/2 mo
The Nano Banana Pro promises a quick‑start for anyone looking to upgrade their photo workflow...
Common Questions Answered
How did ChatGPT compare the battery endurance of the Garmin Vivoactive 5, Fitbit Versa 4, Pixel Watch 3, and Ticwatch Pro 5?
It broke down each model’s battery life, noting the Garmin Vivoactive 5’s longer endurance suitable for daily use, while the Fitbit Versa 4 and Pixel Watch 3 offered moderate runtimes, and the Ticwatch Pro 5 balanced battery life with its dual‑display design. This comparison helped the author assess which watch fit their usage patterns.
What “best for” use cases did ChatGPT assign to each smartwatch in its recommendation list?
ChatGPT labeled the Garmin Vivoactive 5 as “daily use,” the Fitbit Versa 4 as “budget friendly,” the Pixel Watch 3 as having “strong Android integration,” and the Ticwatch Pro 5 as a versatile option for mixed‑platform users. These tags guided the author toward watches matching their priorities.
Why did the author note that ChatGPT’s recommendations ignored newer smartwatch models like the Pixel Watch 4 and Vivoactive 6?
The AI’s shortlist only included devices released a year or more ago, omitting the more recent Pixel Watch 4 and Vivoactive 6 that the author had originally considered. This limitation highlighted that current shopping features may not always surface the latest products.
Which shopping platforms did the article mention as offering similar AI‑driven recommendation features to ChatGPT?
The piece referenced OpenAI, Google, Perplexity, and Microsoft as providers of new shopping features that can quickly pull data on price, compatibility, and battery life. These services aim to streamline tech purchasing decisions through AI assistance.