Skip to main content
Anthropic researcher Nicholas Carlini, in a lab, discusses Project Glasswing's bug surge.

Editorial illustration for Anthropic researcher Nicholas Carlini reports surge of bugs in Project Glasswing

Anthropic's Project Glasswing: Major Safety Bug Revelations

Anthropic researcher Nicholas Carlini reports surge of bugs in Project Glasswing

Updated: 3 min read

Nicholas Carlini takes a breath, finds a new software bug. That’s his rhythm now. The Anthropic security researcher has been poking at Project Glasswing, a new AI model touted as dangerously powerful.

His tally of unearthed vulnerabilities from the last few weeks alone surpasses every flaw he’d found in his career before this. This isn’t a trickle. It’s a dam break.

Nicholas Carlini, a security researcher at Anthropic, said in a video about Project Glasswing: "I've found more bugs in the last couple of weeks than I found in the rest of my life combined." Simon Willison, a respected developer and commentator, summed it up: "Saying 'our model is too dangerous to release' is a great way to build buzz around a new model," Willison writes, "but in this case I expect their caution is warranted." He would, however, also like to see OpenAI involved, noting that its GPT-5.4 already has a strong reputation for finding security vulnerabilities.

It’s a tired playbook. A company declares its model too hazardous for release. GPT-2 did it.

Claude Mythos did it. Headlines follow; the eventual launches are often quiet, even anticlimactic. But Carlini’s report from the front lines changes the pitch.

When the expert hired to probe your system is overwhelmed by its fragility, the marketing claims gain a sharp, credible edge. Commentator Simon Willison believes the caution is real this time. He also wants OpenAI’s proven GPT-5.4 in the audit room.

The story here isn’t just another “dangerous” AI. It’s that the label might be an understatement.

Common Questions Answered

What specific concerns has Nicholas Carlini raised about Project Glasswing?

Nicholas Carlini has reported an unprecedented surge of bugs in Project Glasswing, claiming he has discovered more bugs in the last couple of weeks than in the rest of his life combined. His findings suggest significant potential vulnerabilities in the AI model that Anthropic has already labeled as too dangerous to release.

Why does Anthropic consider Project Glasswing too dangerous to release?

While the article does not provide explicit details about the specific dangers, Anthropic has labeled the model as too risky due to the numerous bugs and vulnerabilities discovered during internal safety audits. The sheer volume of bugs found by Carlini indicates potential systemic issues that could pose significant risks if the model were to be deployed.

How has the tech community responded to Anthropic's cautious approach with Project Glasswing?

Simon Willison, a respected developer, suggests that while Anthropic's claim of the model being too dangerous might build buzz, he believes their caution is warranted. The tech community appears to be watching the development of Project Glasswing from a cautious distance, recognizing the potential risks associated with advanced AI models.

LIVE03:21OpenAI's Miles Wang in Talks for USD 2B AI Drug Discovery Startup