Skip to main content
Donald Trump and Mid-Atlantic governors discuss tech fees for new power plants, impacting energy bills. [whyy.org](https://wh

AI news illustration: Trump, Mid-Atlantic Governors Push Long-Term Tech Fees for New Power Plants

Trump, Mid‑Atlantic Governors Push Tech Fees for New Plants

Updated: 4 min read

The power grid is gasping for air, and the data centers are the ones holding the oxygen. Artificial intelligence’s insatiable hunger for electricity has pushed demand to a breaking point, and now, the bill is coming due. In an unusual coalition, President Trump and the governors of Mid-Atlantic states, Democrats and Republicans alike, are demanding that tech companies pay for the power plants they force into existence.

The mechanism: long-term fees, contract lengths so extraordinary they would lock in revenue for decades, deterring speculative grid connections and guaranteeing builders a return. But this isn't a done deal. The PJM grid, the nation’s largest, was not even invited to the announcement.

And while the White House and statehouses can push, they cannot mandate. The Department of Energy has been blunter: data centers should pay more than residential customers, unless they bring their own generation or agree to power down during crises. The stakes could not be higher, $15 billion in new generation hangs in the balance, as Americans seethe over rising electricity rates.

The unusually long length of the contracts would ostensibly make it easier to build out new infrastructure by guaranteeing revenue and discouraging speculative requests to connect to the grid by data center developers. The move comes as power grids scramble to meet increasing electricity demand from AI, while lawmakers and tech companies building out new data centers face growing fury from Americans over rising electricity rates. Lawmakers and tech companies building out new data centers face growing fury from Americans over rising electricity rates PJM operates the largest electricity grid in the US, which spans 13 states across the Midwest and Atlantic and includes the concentration of data centers in Virginia.

The governors of all states, including Democrats Josh Shapiro (D-PA) and Wes Moore (D-MD) signed onto the statement issued today with Secretary of Interior Doug Burgum and Secretary of Energy Chris Wright. CNN notes, however, that neither the White House nor governors can mandate the auction. And Bloomberg reports that PJM wasn't invited to the announcement made today.

The Department of Energy (DOE) says data centers should "pay more for new generation than residential customers." Specifically, it calls on PJM to allocate costs for new infrastructure to data centers unless they bring their own power plants online or agree to curtail their energy use during supply crunches. The auction could lead to $15 billion in new power generation, according to the DOE.

The math is stark, and the politics are aligning. A bipartisan coalition of governors, backed by Trump’s energy secretaries, has drawn a clear line: data centers, the voracious engines of AI, must shoulder the cost of the grid they strain. They’ve called for long-term fees, for an auction that could unlock $15 billion in new generation.

Yet here’s the rub, no one in that room can actually mandate it. PJM, the grid operator that would have to execute this vision, wasn’t even invited to the announcement. The White House and statehouses can signal, but they cannot command the market.

This is a high-stakes game of brinkmanship: a demand for accountability that lacks a lever to enforce it. The energy transition, once a story of technology and climate, has become a raw fight over who pays. And if the data centers don’t bring their own power or agree to curtail, the bill lands squarely on every household’s meter.

The governors have drawn the line. Now the question is whether the grid can hold it.

Common Questions Answered

What is the main purpose of the long‑term tech fees proposed by Trump and Mid‑Atlantic governors?

The fees are intended to tie technology firms directly to financing new power plants, guaranteeing revenue for generators and reducing speculative grid‑connection requests from data‑center developers. By doing so, officials hope to secure steady cash flow for projects that have struggled to attract private investment.

How would the proposed emergency auction by PJM affect data‑center developers?

The emergency auction would lock in long‑term contracts for new generators, shifting the cost of building capacity onto data‑center developers and other tech firms. This arrangement aims to smooth financing and discourage speculative requests to connect to the grid, potentially lowering electricity rate pressures on consumers.

Why are regional grids under pressure from AI‑driven electricity demand, according to the article?

Increasing AI workloads are driving rapid growth in electricity consumption, especially from data centers that support AI training and inference. This surge strains existing grid capacity, prompting lawmakers to seek mechanisms like long‑term contracts to ensure new generation can meet the rising demand.

What challenges could PJM face in implementing the unprecedented auction described in the proposal?

PJM has never conducted an auction of this scope, so its existing rules would need to be revised to accommodate long‑term contracts tied to tech fees. Additionally, the plan's success depends on whether technology firms actually sign up for the financing commitments.

LIVE03:21OpenAI's Miles Wang in Talks for USD 2B AI Drug Discovery Startup