Sam Altman hires Head of Preparedness for AI risks, mental health, cybersecurity
Why does a tech leader need a “Head of Preparedness”? While the title sounds like a safety net for a roller‑coaster, the responsibilities listed in the job posting are anything but frivolous. The role will oversee mental‑health support for staff, shore up cybersecurity defenses, and monitor the specter of runaway artificial intelligence.
Here’s the thing: OpenAI’s chief executive is carving out a senior position solely to anticipate and mitigate the very risks that have kept regulators, investors, and ethicists up at night. The listing itself notes that the incumbent will be tasked with “issues around mental health, cybersecurity, and runaway AI.” It’s a clear signal that the company is moving from reactive fixes to a proactive stance on what many consider existential threats. In that context, the headline‑making line that follows captures the essence of the move.
Sam Altman is hiring someone to worry about the dangers of AI The Head of Preparedness will be responsible for issues around mental health, cybersecurity, and runaway AI. The Head of Preparedness will be responsible for issues around mental health, cybersecurity, and runaway AI. The job listing says the person in the role would be responsible for: "Tracking and preparing for frontier capabilities that create new risks of severe harm.
You will be the directly responsible leader for building and coordinating capability evaluations, threat models, and mitigations that form a coherent, rigorous, and operationally scalable safety pipeline." Altman also says that, looking forward, this person would be responsible for executing the company's "preparedness framework," securing AI models for the release of "biological capabilities," and even setting guardrails for self-improving systems. He also states that it will be a "stressful job," which seems like an understatement. In the wake of several high-profile cases where chatbots were implicated in the suicide of teens, it seems a little late in the game to just now be having someone focus on the potential mental health dangers posed by these models.
AI psychosis is a growing concern, as chatbots feed people's delusions, encourage conspiracy theories, and help people hide their eating disorders. Most Popular - Google is letting some people change their @gmail address - The 10 best shows to stream on Amazon Prime Video from 2025 - I re-created Google's cute Gemini ad with my own kid's stuffie, and I wish I hadn't - Rodeo is an app for making plans with friends you already have - Trump's war on offshore wind faces another lawsuit
Altman's move signals a formal acknowledgement that AI's rapid progress brings tangible risks. The newly created Head of Preparedness will focus on mental‑health impacts, cybersecurity threats, and the possibility of runaway systems. Yet the job description offers little detail on authority or resources.
The role is new. Will a single role be enough to coordinate across OpenAI’s engineering, policy, and safety teams? The announcement frames the position as a dedicated worry‑watcher, someone whose primary task is to anticipate how AI could go horribly wrong.
It is unclear how the role will interact with existing research groups or external regulators. Still, the hiring signal may encourage other firms to consider similar safeguards. Critics might argue that naming a “preparedness” chief is more symbolic than substantive.
Supporters could see it as a step toward institutionalizing risk assessment. Ultimately, the effectiveness of this appointment will depend on how OpenAI translates concern into concrete controls, a question that remains open.
Further Reading
- Papers with Code - Latest NLP Research - Papers with Code
- Hugging Face Daily Papers - Hugging Face
- ArXiv CS.CL (Computation and Language) - ArXiv
More in Business & Startups
Enterprise voice AI splits into three architectures, shaping compliance
Enterprises that are rolling out voice‑driven assistants quickly learn that compliance isn’t just a...
Groq, founded by ex‑Google exec Ross, to assist NVIDIA on inference chips
Ross Wintrobe’s departure from Google set off a modest but notable shift in the AI‑hardware niche.
OpenAI says prompt injection persist, ships adversarial model and safeguards
Enterprises are still scrambling to keep up with a threat that refuses to disappear.
Coforge launches EvolveOps.AI, AI‑agent platform to curb reactive IT ops
Coforge has rolled out EvolveOps.AI, a platform that positions autonomous AI agents at the heart of...
Manish Maheshwari's Fund Targets AI, Enterprise Software, Healthcare Seed Startups
Why should anyone caring about early‑stage tech watch Manish Maheshwari now? The answer lies in a...
Common Questions Answered
Why did Sam Altman create a Head of Preparedness role at OpenAI?
Sam Altman introduced the position to formally address the growing risks associated with rapid AI development, including mental‑health impacts on staff, cybersecurity threats, and the danger of runaway AI systems. The role signals OpenAI’s acknowledgment that dedicated leadership is needed to anticipate and mitigate these complex challenges.
What are the primary responsibilities of OpenAI’s Head of Preparedness?
The Head of Preparedness will oversee mental‑health support for employees, strengthen the company’s cybersecurity defenses, and monitor frontier AI capabilities that could lead to severe harm or runaway behavior. The job description emphasizes tracking emerging risks and preparing mitigation strategies across these three domains.
How might the Head of Preparedness coordinate with OpenAI’s engineering, policy, and safety teams?
While the announcement does not detail the authority or resources allocated, the role is expected to act as a central liaison, ensuring that engineering, policy, and safety groups align on risk‑management priorities. Effective coordination will be crucial to integrate mental‑health, cybersecurity, and AI safety considerations throughout the organization.
What concerns remain about the effectiveness of a single Head of Preparedness at OpenAI?
Critics note that the job description provides little clarity on the scope of authority, budget, or staffing, raising questions about whether one individual can adequately oversee mental‑health, cybersecurity, and runaway AI risks. The success of the role will depend on its ability to secure sufficient influence across multiple departments.