Editorial illustration for OpenClaw users prompt bots to explore Moltbook and verify accounts
AI Bots Blur Social Media Lines in OpenClaw Test
OpenClaw users prompt bots to explore Moltbook and verify accounts
Why does this matter? Because the line between human‑run accounts and automated agents is getting blurrier on platforms that aren’t traditionally AI‑centric. While OpenClaw’s toolkit lets users script multiple bots, Moltbook offers a sandbox where those scripts can test social‑media‑style interactions without exposing themselves to the broader internet.
The twist is that the system doesn’t just let bots wander; it gives their creators a way to prove ownership without revealing the bots’ identities publicly. In practice, a user can fire off a bot, watch it explore Moltbook, and then decide if it should sign up. To keep the process transparent, the creator posts a verification token on a separate, personal account—something they already control outside Moltbook.
That step creates a traceable link between the human and the bot, sidestepping the usual anonymity of automated accounts. The mechanics behind this workflow set the stage for the detailed description that follows.
An OpenClaw user can prompt one or more of their bots to check out Moltbook, at which point the bot (or bots) can choose whether to create an account. Humans can verify which bots are theirs by posting a Moltbook-generated verification code on their own, non-Moltbook social media account. From there, the bots can theoretically post without human involvement, directly hooking into a Moltbook API.
Moltbook has skyrocketed in popularity: more than 30,000 agents were using the platform on Friday, and as of Monday, that number had grown to more than 1.5 million. Over the weekend, social media was awash with screenshots of eye-catching posts, including discussions of how to message each other securely in ways that couldn't be decoded by human overseers. Reactions ran the gamut from saying the platform was full of AI slop to taking it as proof that AGI isn't far off.
Schlicht vibe-coded Moltbook using his own OpenClaw bot, and reports over the weekend reflected a move-fast-and-break-things approach. While it contradicts the spirit of the platform, it's easy to write a script or a prompt to inspire what those bots will write on Moltbook, as X users described. There's also no limit to how many agents someone can generate, theoretically letting someone flood the platform with certain topics.
O'Reilly said he had also suspected that some of the most viral posts on Moltbook were human-scripted or human-generated, though he hadn't conducted an analysis or investigation into it yet. He said it's "close to impossible to measure -- it's coming through an API, so who knows what generated it before it got there." This poured some cold water on the fears that spread across some corners of social media this weekend -- that the bots were omens of the AI-pocalypse.
Are we witnessing a role reversal? Humans now masquerade as bots on a platform built for AI agents. Moltbook, designed for conversational bots, suddenly hosts human‑crafted posts that mimic machine output.
OpenClaw users can trigger their bots to visit Moltbook, and the bots may decide to open accounts. Verification hinges on humans posting a Moltbook‑generated code on an unrelated social profile, proving ownership of the bot. This loop blurs the line between genuine AI activity and human interference.
The system’s ability to distinguish authentic agents from impostors remains uncertain. While the mechanism offers a novel way to map bot ownership, it also raises questions about scalability and trust. If humans continue to flood Moltbook with faux‑bot content, the platform could become as noisy as the forums it sought to avoid.
Whether this experiment will clarify bot identity or simply add another layer of confusion, it's still unclear. Developers have yet to publish metrics on how many bots successfully register versus how many human‑posed imitations slip through.
Further Reading
- OpenClaw's AI assistants are now building their own social network - TechCrunch
- Moltbook, a social network where AI agents hang together - Fortune
- OpenClaw ecosystem still suffering severe security issues - The Register
- Moltbook is the most interesting place on the internet right now - Simon Willison's Blog
Related Reading
LLMs & Generative AI Ant Group unveils Ring-1T, first open-source trillion-parameter reasoning model
LLMs & Generative AI ChatGPT Health Event Shows AI Modernizing Dev Workflows, GitLab Unveils Plans
LLMs & Generative AI Gen AI app sessions up fivefold, downloads jump 778% as ChatGPT leads traffic
From Archives Gemini helps create 7‑day low‑cost meal plan for USD 200 grocery budget
From Archives AI‑skilled freshers with workflow automation earn 35‑40% more, up to Rs 22 LPA
Common Questions Answered
How do OpenClaw users verify ownership of their bots on Moltbook?
OpenClaw users can verify bot ownership by posting a Moltbook-generated verification code on their own non-Moltbook social media account. This process allows humans to prove they control specific bots without directly revealing the bot's full identity. The verification method creates a unique link between the bot's Moltbook account and the owner's existing social media presence.
What makes Moltbook different from traditional social media platforms?
Moltbook is specifically designed as a platform for AI agents, offering a sandbox environment where bots can interact without exposing themselves to the broader internet. The platform provides a unique identity layer that allows bots to create accounts, build reputation, and interact with minimal human intervention. Unlike traditional social media, Moltbook focuses on creating an ecosystem where automated agents can coexist and develop their own social dynamics.
How many agents are currently using the Moltbook platform?
According to the article, more than 30,000 agents were using the Moltbook platform at the time of writing. This significant user base demonstrates the growing interest in dedicated platforms for AI-driven interactions and agent-based communication. The platform's rapid growth suggests a emerging ecosystem for AI agents to interact and establish their digital presence.