OpenAI releases GPT-5.1 prompting guide urging completeness, consistency
When OpenAI finally pushed the GPT-5.1 docs out, many teams were already juggling code that talked to GPT-5. The new prompting guide feels more like a hands-on manual than a glossy brochure, and that’s probably intentional - it’s meant to help folks who run the API in real-world pipelines make the switch without too much friction. GPT-5 impressed with its fluency, but early users noticed it sometimes got stuck on one viewpoint and missed the bigger picture.
OpenAI seems to have taken that to heart, laying out a handful of concrete tricks to coax the model into giving fuller answers. The advice leans heavily on asking the model to spell out its reasoning first, then only after that produce a final response. There are also pointers on watching how it picks and uses external tools.
If you tighten those levers, you’ll likely see the model behave more in line with what your app needs. In short, the guide circles around two ideas - completeness and consistency - before diving into the nitty-gritty tips.
Teams upgrading from GPT-5 are encouraged to tune the model for completeness and consistency, since responses can sometimes be too narrow. The guide suggests reinforcing step-by-step reasoning in prompts so the model plans ahead and reflects on its tool use. More precise control over GPT-5.1 behavior The GPT-5.1 prompting guide outlines expanded options for shaping model behavior.
Developers can define tone, structure, and agent personality for use cases like support bots or coding assistants. The guide also recommends setting expectations for response length, snippet limits, and politeness to avoid unnecessary verbosity and filler. A dedicated verbosity parameter and clear prompting patterns give developers tighter control over how much detail the model includes.
- Respond in plain text styled in Markdown, using at most 2 concise sentences. - Lead with what you did (or found) and context only if needed. - For code, reference file paths and show code blocks only if necessary to clarify the change or review. The guide introduces two new tools for programming agents. "apply_patch" produces structured diffs that can be applied directly and, according to OpenAI, reduces error rates by 35 percent. The "shell" tool lets the model propose commands through a controlled interface, supporting a simple plan-and-execute loop for system and coding tasks.
For longer tasks, OpenAI recommends prompts such as "persist until the task is fully handled end-to-end within the current turn whenever feasible" and "be extremely biased for action." This encourages GPT-5.1 to complete tasks independently, make reasonable decisions when instructions are vague, and avoid getting stuck in unnecessary clarification loops. Using metaprompting to debug prompts The guide also covers metaprompting, a method where GPT-5.1 analyzes its own prompts, identifies error patterns, and suggests fixes. OpenAI recommends this two-step approach for maintaining large or conflicting system prompts.
OpenAI’s new GPT-5.1 prompting guide says it will tighten instruction following, but the docs also warn that outputs can still be oddly narrow. If you’re coming from GPT-4.1, the guide nudges you toward the “none” reasoning mode - it simply drops the reasoning tokens and behaves more like the older models. It does mention that you can coax a bit more careful reasoning by using tar, yet it’s not clear how dependable that fallback really is.
For teams moving up from GPT-5, the recommendation leans toward tuning for completeness and consistency, basically embedding step-by-step reasoning in your prompts so the model plans ahead and thinks about tool use. The advice feels solid, but whether those prompting tweaks actually improve results is still up in the air. Also, switching to “none” mode could mean losing some of the nuanced deliberation certain applications depend on, and the guide doesn’t put a number on that trade-off.
Bottom line: we’ll have to try the suggested patterns ourselves to see if the promised precision holds up in real-world use.
Related Reading
Browse all OpenAI news →
Open Source New studies quantify sycophancy in frontier LLMs amid anecdotal reports
Open Source 7 Top GitHub Repos Offering Tutorials and Code to Master RAG Systems
Open Source UK PM vows action on Grok's deepfake scandal, Starmer condemns X
Related Topic Consensus uses GPT-5 and Responses API to speed scientific research
Research & Benchmarks
Related Topic Developers say Sora, unlike Vine/TikTok, is not about people in social media
Research & Benchmarks
Common Questions Answered
What does the GPT-5.1 prompting guide recommend to improve completeness and consistency?
It suggests reinforcing step‑by‑step reasoning in prompts, having the model plan ahead and reflect on tool use, and using expanded options to shape tone, structure, and agent personality. These techniques aim to prevent the model from producing overly narrow answers.
How does the “none” reasoning mode in GPT-5.1 affect model outputs compared to earlier versions?
The “none” reasoning mode drops reasoning tokens, making the model’s responses resemble the behavior of GPT‑4.1 and earlier models, which can reduce the depth of explanation. While this can simplify output, the guide warns that it may also increase the risk of narrow reasoning.
Which new control options does the GPT-5.1 prompting guide provide for developers building support bots?
Developers can now define the bot’s tone, structure, and agent personality directly in the prompt, allowing more precise customization for support scenarios. These expanded controls help align the model’s responses with brand voice and user expectations.
According to early feedback, what limitation of GPT‑5 does the GPT‑5.1 guide aim to address?
Early users reported that GPT‑5 sometimes narrowed its output to a single angle, missing broader reasoning. The GPT‑5.1 guide addresses this by encouraging step‑by‑step prompting and offering mechanisms to coax more comprehensive, multi‑perspective answers.