Meta's SAM 3 falters on niche technical terms and complex logical prompts
When I first tried Meta’s third-generation Segment Anything Model, SAM 3, the headline was clear: a single system that can read both pictures and text. The open-source drop got a lot of buzz, with people imagining everything from tagging satellite images to following user prompts. In practice, the model shows its limits pretty quickly.
It will draw a box around an object if you give it a simple cue, but the moment the language gets a bit niche or the reasoning gets multi-step, the results wobble. Ask it to name something described with specialist jargon, or to locate “the second-to-last book from the right on the top shelf,” and you’ll see the output become hit-or-miss. That matters for anyone wanting to plug SAM 3 into a critical pipeline, think radiology workflows or inventory systems, because a mis-label could be costly.
Meta seems to be leaning on a fix: attach extra components to shore up the weak spots.
**SAM 3 struggles with highly specific technical terms outside its training data ("zero-shot"), such as those in medical imaging. The model also fails with complex logical descriptions like "the second to last book from the right on the top shelf." To address this, Meta suggests pairing SAM 3 with mul…
SAM 3 struggles with highly specific technical terms outside its training data ("zero-shot"), such as those in medical imaging. The model also fails with complex logical descriptions like "the second to last book from the right on the top shelf." To address this, Meta suggests pairing SAM 3 with multimodal language models such as Llama or Gemini, a combination it calls the "SAM 3 Agent." Reconstructing 3D worlds from 2D images Alongside SAM 3, Meta released SAM 3D, a suite of two models designed to generate 3D reconstructions from single 2D images. SAM 3D Objects focuses on reconstructing objects and scenes.
Since 3D training data is scarce compared to 2D images, Meta applied its "data engine" principle here as well. Annotators rate multiple AI-generated mesh options, while the hardest examples are routed to expert 3D artists. This method allowed Meta to annotate nearly one million images with 3D information, creating a system that turns photos into manipulable 3D objects.
The second model, SAM 3D Body, specializes in capturing human poses and shapes.
Will SAM 3 live up to its promise? The model pushes past fixed categories - you can feed it plain text, a reference image, or even a sketch and it will try to segment the idea across photos or video. In practice, though, it seems to stumble when the prompt drifts into niche jargon that wasn’t in its training data; medical imaging terms, for example, often confuse it.
The same goes for oddly specific spatial cues - ask it to pick “the second-to-last book from the right on the top shelf” and it will usually miss. Meta’s answer is to bolt on extra tools, but it’s still unclear how much that helps. The open-vocabulary goal is obvious, and the Segment Anything Playground lets anyone poke at the model themselves.
Still, the gaps in zero-shot understanding make me wonder how ready it is for specialized fields. For everyday, low-stakes work the flexibility could be handy, yet I’d be wary of trusting it with anything that demands high precision. Only more real-world testing will show if the add-ons can fill those holes.
Related Reading
Browse all Meta news →
Open Source New studies quantify sycophancy in frontier LLMs amid anecdotal reports
Open Source 7 Top GitHub Repos Offering Tutorials and Code to Master RAG Systems
Open Source UK PM vows action on Grok's deepfake scandal, Starmer condemns X
Related Topic Meta's Free Transformer decides review sentiment up front, then writes
LLMs & Generative AI
Related Topic Yann LeCun to leave Meta, launch AI startup, distanced from Llama models
Business & Startups
Common Questions Answered
Why does Meta's SAM 3 struggle with highly specific technical terms like those in medical imaging?
SAM 3 was trained on a broad but limited dataset and lacks exposure to niche vocabularies such as medical imaging jargon. Consequently, its zero‑shot performance drops when encountering these specialized terms, leading to inaccurate or missing segmentations.
What kinds of complex logical prompts cause failures in SAM 3, and can you give an example?
The model falters on multi‑step spatial reasoning tasks that require interpreting layered instructions. For instance, the prompt "the second to last book from the right on the top shelf" confuses SAM 3, resulting in incorrect or incomplete object segmentation.
How does Meta propose to improve SAM 3's limitations with technical terminology and logical descriptions?
Meta suggests coupling SAM 3 with multimodal language models such as Llama or Gemini, forming what they call the "SAM 3 Agent." This hybrid approach leverages the language model's reasoning abilities to complement SAM 3's visual segmentation strengths.
What is the relationship between SAM 3 and the newly released SAM 3D suite?
SAM 3D is a companion suite that extends SAM 3's capabilities to reconstruct three‑dimensional worlds from two‑dimensional images. While SAM 3 focuses on segmenting objects based on textual or visual cues, SAM 3D adds depth estimation and 3D modeling to the workflow.