Huang says AI is industry backbone, while panelists like Li voice skepticism
When six AI leaders sat down for a roundtable called “Six AI all-stars weigh in on hype, hope, and the reality behind the field,” the room felt charged. Investment numbers were climbing, data-center racks were expanding, and every headline seemed to promise AI’s takeover. Still, the conversation quickly split.
A few of us pointed to the surge in compute demand - numbers that look almost record-breaking. Others, like Li and LeCun, warned that the hype might be outpacing real progress, especially when it comes to human-like thinking. Huang, on the other hand, pushed back hard, saying the technology is already becoming the backbone of a new industry.
Companies are already pledging billions for the infrastructure that could support the next wave of intelligent services, so the stakes feel real. It’s unclear whether we’re on the brink of a breakthrough or just riding a wave of excitement, but the disagreement among the panelists makes the next exchange worth watching.
Huang, of course, maintained that AI isn't a short-lived bubble, but the backbone of a new industry with a growing need for data centers. Others on the panel were more skeptical about the hype. Li and LeCun warned against expecting anything close to human-level intelligence soon, pointing out the major scientific roadblocks still ahead.
"We're missing something big still," LeCun said, adding that LLMs won't reach human intelligence, let alone anything like superintelligence. "That's why AI progress is not just a question of more infrastructure, more data, more investment, or further development of the current paradigm," LeCun continued. "It's actually a scientific question of how we make progress toward the next generation of AI."
Did the panel settle the hype? Not really. Jensen Huang kept saying AI is the backbone of a new industry, pointing to the growing demand for data centers as a sign it isn’t just a bubble.
Fei-Fei Li and Yann LeCun, on the other hand, warned that hoping for human-level intelligence is probably premature - today’s models still miss that mark. Bill Dally, Yoshua Bengio and Jeff Hinton added some nuance: they see the GPU boom and big language models moving fast, yet they stress that scaling, energy use and real understanding remain tough problems. The talk made it clear that breakthroughs sit beside a lot of unanswered questions.
Everyone agreed AI is reshaping tech, but they split on how soon the loftier promises will arrive. Whether the sector’s growth will turn into the advertised capabilities is still unclear, so more research will be needed. The six-person lineup, gathered for the Queen Elizabeth Prize 2025 ceremony, spanned hardware to theory, and their comments on GPUs and large models highlighted both the hardware push and the software puzzles that linger.
A lot still unknown.
Common Questions Answered
What did Jensen Huang claim about AI's role in the industry during the roundtable?
Jensen Huang asserted that AI is the backbone of a new industry, emphasizing a growing need for data centers. He argued that AI is not a short‑lived bubble but a lasting driver of infrastructure expansion.
Which panelists expressed skepticism about achieving human‑level intelligence with current LLMs?
Fei‑Fei Li and Yann LeCun warned that expectations of human‑level intelligence are premature, citing major scientific roadblocks. LeCun specifically said that large language models (LLMs) will not reach human or superintelligence anytime soon.
How did the panelists describe the current compute demand and its impact on data‑center expansion?
Several participants highlighted record‑breaking compute demand, which is driving rapid expansion of data‑center footprints. This surge in demand supports Huang’s view that AI fuels significant infrastructure growth.
What nuance did Bill Dally, Yoshua Bengio, and Jeff Hinton add to the discussion about AI progress?
Bill Dally, Yoshua Bengio, and Jeff Hinton acknowledged the rapid GPU boom and notable advances in large‑scale models. At the same time, they cautioned that substantial research challenges remain before reaching higher levels of AI capability.