60% of singles label AI relationships as cheating, sparking divorce concerns
The conversation around artificial‑intelligence companions has moved from novelty blogs to living rooms. Over the past year, dating apps have added chatbot “partners,” and advertisers are touting AI‑driven romance as a service. Yet the numbers suggest a cultural friction point: while tech firms tout engagement metrics, a growing share of adults appear uneasy about what counts as fidelity.
Market analysts note that the same platforms reporting higher usage also flag a spike in relationship counseling inquiries. Meanwhile, legal scholars point to a patchwork of statutes that have yet to address non‑human intimacy. As the line between simulation and partnership blurs, the question isn’t just how many people are trying AI romance, but how society judges those choices.
This tension sets the stage for a striking statistic from two recent surveys conducted by Clarity Check and Indiana University’s Kinsey Institute.
Some 60 percent of singles now say AI relationships are considered a form of cheating, according to two recent surveys by Clarity Check and Indiana University's Kinsey Institute. "The law is still developing alongside these experiences. But some people think of it as a true relationship, and sometimes better than one with a person," says Palmer, whose Orlando-based firm has worked with spouses who have gotten divorced or are going through a divorce due to a partner cheating with AI.
Palmer declined to discuss any detailed information due to client confidentiality, but said one of her current cases involves money being expended and private information being shared--such as bank accounts, social security numbers, and birth information--with a chatbot, which was "consuming the spouse's life and affecting career performance." More and more, courts are beginning to see clients cite emotional bonds with AI companions as reasons for marital strain or dissolution. Though legal classifications of AI still vary by state in matters of family law, Palmer adds that laws classifying AI as a "third party, not a person" are fast approaching in progressive states like California. She doesn't anticipate courts will legally recognize AI companions as people--debates around AI personhood have been swirling for as long as the tech has existed--but they may be recognized as "a reason" for why divorce is merited.
Can a chatbot replace a partner? The surveys suggest many singles already view it as infidelity. Sixty percent of respondents said AI relationships count as cheating, according to Clarity Check and the Kinsey Institute.
Yet the legal framework is still catching up, leaving couples in a gray area. Rebecca Palmer, a divorce attorney, notes that emotional voids often drive people toward these digital companions; she warns that the pattern could translate into more filings, though concrete data are lacking. Chatbots offer steady, conflict‑free interaction, which can be tempting for those feeling unheard at home.
For married partners, however, the line between support and betrayal remains blurry. Some participants claim they treat the AI as a genuine relationship, raising questions about consent and responsibility. Unclear whether courts will classify such bonds as adultery, the current ambiguity may prompt couples to renegotiate boundaries before any legal precedent emerges.
Ultimately, the rise of AI romance adds a new layer to longstanding marital challenges, and its long‑term impact is still uncertain.
Further Reading
- AI chatbots are being blamed for tearing marriages apart: here's why - AS USA
- AI Partners and Digital Cheating: How Technology is Reshaping Romance in 2025 - Met by Nick
- When AI Feels “Too Real”: Influences on Divorce in 2025 - FamilyLLB
- ChatGPT Divorce: AI Interferes - Summit Family Law
- A.I. Infidelity Evidence: Digital Betrayal & Divorce Cases - Hayat Family Law
Common Questions Answered
What percentage of singles consider AI relationships to be cheating, according to recent surveys?
Sixty percent of singles reported that they view AI relationships as a form of cheating. This figure comes from two surveys conducted by Clarity Check and Indiana University's Kinsey Institute.
Which organizations conducted the surveys that found AI relationships are seen as cheating by many singles?
The surveys were carried out by Clarity Check, a market‑research firm, and the Kinsey Institute at Indiana University. Both groups surveyed adult respondents about their attitudes toward AI companions and fidelity.
How does divorce attorney Rebecca Palmer describe the impact of AI companions on marriage stability?
Rebecca Palmer says emotional voids often push spouses toward AI companions, and that this pattern could lead to more divorce filings. She warns that the legal system is still catching up, leaving couples in a gray area regarding infidelity.
What legal challenges are emerging as AI relationships become more common, according to the article?
The article notes that the law is still developing around AI‑driven romance, creating uncertainty about whether such relationships constitute infidelity. This lack of clear legal guidance leaves couples navigating a gray area when AI companionship leads to marital conflict.