Editorial illustration for Guillermo del Toro Blasts AI Art: 'I'd Rather Die Than See This Go Mainstream
Del Toro Declares War on AI Art: 'I'd Rather Die'
Guillermo del Toro Says He’d Prefer Death Over AI Art Going Mainstream
Guillermo del Toro isn't just a filmmaker, he's a passionate defender of artistic integrity. His latest broadside takes direct aim at artificial intelligence's encroachment into creative spaces, declaring he would "rather die" than watch AI-generated art become mainstream.
But del Toro's stance isn't a knee-jerk rejection of technology. It's rooted in a deeper understanding of storytelling, creativity, and the philosophical questions that have long haunted artists and scientists alike.
His perspective echoes a profound literary tradition, one that traces back to seminal works exploring humanity's complex relationship with creation. Take Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein" - a novel that isn't just a horror story, but a nuanced exploration of scientific ambition and existential questioning.
In fact, del Toro sees something remarkably resonant in Shelley's approach. Her work wasn't about monsters, but about the fundamental human impulse to understand our own origins and purpose.
So when he speaks about art and artificial intelligence, he's tapping into something far more complex than a simple technological debate.
The Goodwin-Shelley household of Mary's youth was really pro-scientific. I think that Frankenstein is actually closer to Paradise Lost. It's man rising up to God and saying, "Why am I here when I didn't ask to be born?" Which is a very romantic--and by romantic, I mean the Romantic movement--question.
Victor is someone who believes very much in science, but he's also tragic. He almost doesn't ever confront what he's done. In fact, there is a big harangue Victor does in the book toward the sailors saying, You should follow your captain all the way.
Now, in my opinion, the arrogance of Victor is very common now: the tyrant that believes himself to be a victim. But that is true, or has been true since the beginning of time. Absolutely everyone from political figures to Silicon Valley tech bros.
The fact that we enthroned tyranny as a form of certainty, as if it was an attribute. I think the people I most admire are people that are riddled with doubts. When I think about playing God, I also think of AI.
Which is also perhaps something that never asked to be born. Do you see parallels between the makers of AI and, say, Victor? I was not interested in making any [in this film].
I understand [using] it in engineering and biochemistry and mathematics, because those are permutations. In art, I don't think anyone asked for it. Nobody raised their hand and said, "Could you invent this?" No one asked for Sora.
Look, the real threshold has not been crossed. It's not people making this, it's people consuming it--at a cost. I will gladly pay $4.99 for a song by the Beatles or Dylan, you name it, but who is going to pay $4.99 for something created with AI?
Del Toro's passionate stance against AI art reveals a deeper philosophical conflict rooted in creative authenticity. His perspective, drawing parallels to Frankenstein's narrative, suggests a profound unease with technological creation that mirrors human artistic expression.
The filmmaker's visceral reaction - preferring death over AI art becoming mainstream - signals more than simple resistance. It speaks to a fundamental concern about the nature of creativity and the boundaries between human imagination and machine-generated content.
By invoking the Romantic movement's core questions about existence and creation, del Toro frames AI art as something more than a technical idea. He sees it as a potential existential challenge to artistic agency, echoing Victor Frankenstein's complex relationship with his own unintended creation.
His comments suggest a nuanced critique: AI art isn't just about technical capability, but about the philosophical implications of machine-generated creativity. Del Toro seems to argue that art isn't just about output, but about the deeply human questions embedded in its creation.
Further Reading
Related Reading
LLMs & Generative AI Ant Group unveils Ring-1T, first open-source trillion-parameter reasoning model
LLMs & Generative AI ChatGPT Health Event Shows AI Modernizing Dev Workflows, GitLab Unveils Plans
LLMs & Generative AI Gen AI app sessions up fivefold, downloads jump 778% as ChatGPT leads traffic
From Archives AI Psychosis Highlights Mental Health Pros' Lack of ChatGPT Access
From Archives Anthropic says language model checks its own activation states before responding
Common Questions Answered
How does del Toro connect AI art to the philosophical themes in Frankenstein?
Del Toro draws parallels between AI art and Frankenstein's narrative of technological creation, exploring the deeper philosophical questions about creation, agency, and the boundaries between human and artificial creativity. His perspective suggests that AI art, like Frankenstein's monster, raises profound questions about the nature of creation and the responsibilities of creators.
Why is Guillermo del Toro so strongly opposed to AI-generated art becoming mainstream?
Del Toro believes that AI art threatens artistic integrity and the fundamental essence of human creativity. His stance goes beyond simple technological resistance, representing a deeper concern about the potential loss of authentic artistic expression and the philosophical implications of machine-generated art.
How does del Toro's view of AI art relate to the Romantic movement's philosophical approach?
Drawing from the Romantic movement's philosophical traditions, del Toro sees AI art as a problematic form of creation that lacks the emotional depth and existential questioning inherent in human artistic expression. His perspective echoes the Romantic concern with individual creativity and the profound questions of existence that art traditionally explores.