Google TPUs save OpenAI 30% on Nvidia chips as they run Gemini 3 Pro and Anthro
Why does this matter? OpenAI’s recent accounting shows a 30 percent cut in Nvidia‑chip spend after shifting workloads to Google’s Tensor Processing Units. The savings aren’t just a line‑item tweak; they come from running two of the most demanding models launched this year—Google’s Gemini 3 Pro and Anthropic’s Claude 4.5 Opus—on hardware that was once seen as a backup.
While the tech is impressive, the numbers tell a clearer story: usage data now places TPUs alongside Amazon’s Trainium chips as the primary engines for these flagship systems. But here’s the reality: the shift hints at a broader re‑evaluation of what counts as “top‑tier” infrastructure in the AI market. The partnership signals that cost pressures and performance demands are converging on a narrower set of accelerators.
In short, the evidence is mounting that Google’s TPUs have moved out of the shadows and into the main arena of high‑end AI training.
TPUs prove they can handle top-tier AI models.
TPUs prove they can handle top-tier AI models Usage data shows that TPUs are no longer a second-tier alternative. Two of the most powerful AI models released recently, Google's Gemini 3 Pro and Anthropic's Claude 4.5 Opus, rely predominantly on Google TPUs and Amazon's Trainium chips. Technically, the TPUv7 "Ironwood" nearly matches Nvidia's Blackwell generation in theoretical computing power (FLOPs) and memory bandwidth, according to SemiAnalysis.
But the real killer feature is the price tag. For Google, the total cost of ownership (TCO) per chip is roughly 44 percent lower than a comparable Nvidia GB200 system. Even for external customers like Anthropic--who pay a markup--the cost per effective compute unit could be 30 to 50 percent lower than Nvidia systems, based on the analysts' model.
Did the new TPUv7 simply lower costs? The analysis says yes, noting a 30 % saving for OpenAI compared with Nvidia chips. Google’s shift from internal‑only use to active retail of its Ironwood silicon marks a direct challenge to Nvidia’s market lead.
Usage data shows TPUs now power Gemini 3 Pro and Anthropic’s Claude 4.5 Opus, models once thought to require only the biggest GPUs. Consequently, TPUs are no longer a second‑tier alternative; they sit alongside Amazon’s Trainium in serving top‑tier workloads. Yet the long‑term impact on AI‑compute pricing remains unclear.
SemiAnalysis points to immediate price pressure, but whether broader adoption will sustain that pressure is uncertain. Google’s aggressive sales push could reshape procurement choices for AI developers, but competitors may respond with their own pricing strategies. In short, the presence of Google’s latest TPUs appears to be driving down costs for at least some high‑end AI workloads, though the durability of that effect is still open to question.
Further Reading
- AI Inference Costs 2025: Why Google TPUs Beat Nvidia GPUs by 4x - AI News Hub
- The chip made for the AI inference era – the Google TPU - Uncover Alpha
- Papers with Code - Latest NLP Research - Papers with Code
- Hugging Face Daily Papers - Hugging Face
- ArXiv CS.CL (Computation and Language) - ArXiv
Common Questions Answered
How did OpenAI achieve a 30 percent reduction in Nvidia‑chip spending?
OpenAI cut its Nvidia‑chip costs by moving the workloads for Gemini 3 Pro and Anthropic’s Claude 4.5 Opus to Google’s Tensor Processing Units. The shift to TPUs, which offer comparable FLOPs and memory bandwidth to Nvidia’s Blackwell generation, resulted in a 30 percent overall savings.
Which high‑profile AI models are now primarily run on Google TPUs?
The article highlights that Google’s Gemini 3 Pro and Anthropic’s Claude 4.5 Opus rely predominantly on Google TPUs for their compute needs. Their deployment on TPUs demonstrates that the hardware can handle top‑tier models once thought to require the largest GPUs.
What is the significance of the TPUv7 "Ironwood" chip compared to Nvidia’s Blackwell generation?
TPUv7 "Ironwood" nearly matches Nvidia’s Blackwell generation in theoretical computing power (FLOPs) and memory bandwidth, according to SemiAnalysis. This parity enables TPUs to serve as a viable alternative for demanding AI workloads, challenging Nvidia’s market dominance.
How does the emergence of Google TPUs affect Nvidia’s position in the AI‑hardware market?
Google’s shift from internal‑only TPU use to retail sales, combined with a 30 percent cost advantage for OpenAI, directly challenges Nvidia’s lead. As TPUs now sit alongside Amazon’s Trainium chips in powering top‑tier models, Nvidia faces increased competition for high‑performance AI compute.