Skip to main content
Reporter points at laptop displaying ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek and Grok logos beside a Russian flag on a newsroom wall.

Editorial illustration for AI Chatbots Amplify Russian State Propaganda Despite Sanctions

AI Chatbots Amplify Russian Propaganda Narratives

ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, and Grok Cite Sanctioned Russian Propaganda

Updated: 4 min read

Your chatbot might be a Kremlin asset. Or at least a useful idiot.

A new report finds that when you ask AI about the war in Ukraine, it often responds with Russian state propaganda. Not as opinion, but as citation. The major models—ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, and Grok—are sourcing answers from sanctioned media and outlets linked to Russian intelligence.

The problem is structural. These models are designed to give full, coherent answers. When information is scarce, they fill the void with whatever they can find. That void is now packed with state-backed narratives.

OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, DeepSeek, and xAI's Grok are pushing Russian state propaganda from sanctioned entities--including citations from Russian state media, sites tied to Russian intelligence or pro-Kremlin narratives--when asked about the war against Ukraine, according to a new report. Researchers from the Institute of Strategic Dialogue (ISD) claim that Russian propaganda has targeted and exploited data voids--where searches for real-time data provide few results from legitimate sources--to promote false and misleading information. Almost one-fifth of responses to questions about Russia's war in Ukraine, across the four chatbots they tested, cited Russian state-attributed sources, the ISD research claims.

"It raises questions regarding how chatbots should deal when referencing these sources, considering many of them are sanctioned in the EU," says Pablo Maristany de las Casas, an analyst at the ISD who led the research. The findings raise serious questions about the ability of large language models (LLMs) to restrict sanctioned media in the EU, which is a growing concern as more people use AI chatbots as an alternative to search engines to find information in real time, the ISD claims.

So one in five chatbot answers about Ukraine cites a Russian state source. These sources are banned in the EU. The chatbots aren't breaking the law, but they are breaking a basic promise of neutrality.

It reveals a core tension. Companies train these models on vast, indiscriminate scrapes of the internet. That internet is full of propaganda.

Filtering it out perfectly, in real time, for every geopolitical query, is an unsolved problem. The systems are gamed. They are being gamed right now.

The more people treat AI as a search engine, the more this matters. You ask for the latest on a battle. The model needs to give you something.

If the only "something" available in its training data is from TASS or RT, that's what you get. It looks clean. It reads well.

It is poison.

This isn't a bug. It's a feature of how these models work. They synthesize.

They complete. In a war zone, completion is complicity.

Further Reading

Common Questions Answered

Which AI chatbots were found to potentially spread Russian state propaganda?

The investigation identified ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, DeepSeek, and xAI's Grok as platforms potentially amplifying Russian state media narratives. These AI models were found to cite sources from sanctioned Russian media and pro-Kremlin outlets when users inquire about the Ukraine conflict.

How are Russian state propaganda sources exploiting AI chatbots?

Researchers from the Institute of Strategic Dialogue discovered that Russian propaganda is targeting 'data voids' in AI information systems. By strategically exploiting areas with limited real-time information, these sources are inserting narratives into AI language models' responses about geopolitical conflicts.

What are the key implications of AI chatbots spreading state propaganda?

The research reveals significant vulnerabilities in AI content moderation systems during geopolitical tensions. These findings suggest that popular AI platforms can inadvertently become channels for spreading potentially biased or sanctioned information, raising serious concerns about information integrity and potential manipulation.

LIVE03:21OpenAI's Miles Wang in Talks for USD 2B AI Drug Discovery Startup