Illustration for: Unified Ontologies Enable Agentic AI to Reason Across Suppliers and Regulators
AI Tools & Apps

Unified Ontologies Enable Agentic AI to Reason Across Suppliers and Regulators

2 min read

The buzz around “agentic AI” has shifted from flashy demos to a practical hurdle: how these systems understand the world they’re asked to navigate. Companies are pouring resources into data models that can speak the same language across departments, partners and even external watchdogs. While a single‑app AI can answer a question, it falters when the query touches a supplier contract, a regulatory filing or a customer‑service workflow that lives in a different system.

That disconnect is why many tech leaders are now stitching together ontologies—structured vocabularies that map concepts from finance, logistics, compliance and sales into a single, searchable framework. The effort isn’t just about data hygiene; it’s about giving autonomous agents the context they need to act responsibly and efficiently. As the industry experiments with linking and federating these knowledge graphs, the promise of AI that moves fluidly between vendors, regulators and end users begins to look less like a pipe dream and more like an emerging software reality.

A unified ontology is essential for today’s agentic AI tools…

A unified ontology is essential for today's agentic AI tools. As organizations link and federate ontologies, a new software paradigm emerges: Agentic AI can reason and act across suppliers, regulators, customers and operations, not just within a single app. As Karp describes it, the aim is "to tether the power of artificial intelligence to objects and relationships in the real world." World models and continuous learning Today's models can hold extensive context, but holding information isn't the same as learning from it.

Continual learning requires the accumulation of understanding, rather than resets with each retraining. To his aim, Google recently announced "Nested Learning" as a potential solution, grounded direclty into existing LLM architecture and training data.

Related Topics: #agentic AI #ontologies #knowledge graphs #continuous learning #nested learning #LLM #Google #Karp

Will unified ontologies deliver on the promise of cross‑domain reasoning? The article posits intellection as the next organizing principle, a term coined to capture the joint cognition of humans and machines within a shared enterprise model. Yet the piece offers no concrete evidence that such a model already functions beyond isolated applications, leaving the practical feasibility of “agentic AI” across suppliers, regulators and customers uncertain.

Because today’s systems still treat AI models as separate tools, the transition to a federated ontology framework may require substantial architectural overhaul, a point the author does not fully address. Moreover, the quoted aim—“to tethe”—remains incomplete, suggesting that the vision is still being articulated rather than realized. Still, the argument that a common semantic layer could enable AI to act beyond a single app is clear, and the notion of linking ontologies is presented as essential for the emerging software paradigm.

Whether organizations can achieve the necessary alignment, and whether intellection will become more than a descriptive label, remains to be seen.

Further Reading

Common Questions Answered

Why is a unified ontology considered essential for today’s agentic AI tools?

A unified ontology provides a common language that lets agentic AI link objects and relationships across disparate systems such as supplier contracts, regulatory filings, and customer‑service workflows. Without it, AI can only operate within a single application, limiting its ability to reason and act across organizational boundaries.

How does a unified ontology enable agentic AI to reason across suppliers, regulators, and customers?

By federating ontologies, a unified model maps real‑world entities and their interconnections, allowing the AI to interpret queries that span multiple domains. This shared representation lets the system generate actions that consider supplier terms, regulatory constraints, and customer needs simultaneously.

What is the concept of “intellection” as described in the article?

Intellection is introduced as the next organizing principle that captures joint cognition between humans and machines within a shared enterprise model. It aims to align human insight with AI reasoning, though the article notes there is currently no concrete evidence of its practical implementation beyond isolated apps.

Does the article provide evidence that unified ontologies already support cross‑domain reasoning in practice?

No, the article acknowledges that while unified ontologies are theoretically promising, it offers no concrete examples of systems successfully reasoning across suppliers, regulators, and customers in real‑world deployments. The feasibility of such cross‑domain agentic AI remains uncertain according to the author.