Trump AI adviser David Sacks says Anthropic weaponizes regulation harms startups
David Sacks, the White House’s self-styled “AI czar” and a venture-capitalist, just took a swipe at Anthropic on X. In his post he claims the company is “weaponizing regulation” and that its tactics “harm startups.” Sacks calls it a “sophisticated regulatory capture strategy based on fear-mongering.” The crux of his accusation is that Anthropic is using policy pressure to tip the market in its own favor. He doesn’t back the charge up with any data, so it’s hard to tell how solid the claim really is.
Still, the language is unmistakable, he frames the behavior as a deliberate effort to bend the rules against smaller firms. The original headline reads, “Trump AI adviser David Sacks says Anthropic weaponizes regulation harms startups,” and a longer version adds, “Trump’s AI advisor accuses Anthropic of ‘regulatory capture.’” Whether this will prompt an official response is still unclear, but the allegation has already set off chatter among industry watchers.
Trump’s new AI adviser David Sacks accuses Anthropic of weaponizing regulation and harming startups. White House “AI czar” and venture capitalist David Sacks has accused AI company Anthropic of running a “sophisticated regulatory capture strategy based on fear-mongering.” In a post on X, Sacks claimed the firm was “principally responsible for the state regulatory frenzy that is damaging the startup ecosystem.” The allegations center on Anthropic’s stance toward U.S. Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark called Sacks’s attack “perplexing,” according to Bloomberg.
Clark said the company was “extremely lined up” with the administration “in many areas,” though it held “a slightly different view” in some. Anthropic expressed those views, he added, in a “substantive, fact-forward way.” He found it “very bizarre” that others were not doing likewise, suggesting that “says something larger about where we are in the country’s history more than anything else.” Anthropic backed California’s transparency law SB53 The dispute appears to stem from Anthropic’s support for California Senate Bill 53, a landmark law imposing transparency requirements and whistleblower protections for AI developers.
David Sacks - the White House’s AI adviser and a venture-capitalist - took to X this week and blamed Anthropic for “the state regulatory frenzy that is damaging the startup ecosystem.” He went further, calling the company’s moves a “sophisticated regulatory capture strategy based on fear-mongering,” and suggested Anthropic is weaponising its policy positions. The accusation leans heavily on Sacks’ reading of Anthropic’s public comments about U.S. AI bills, but the post doesn’t point to any concrete proof that the firm actually steered specific regulations.
We haven’t seen lobbying records, internal memos, or a clear causal link, so the claim stays unverified. It’s also fuzzy whether Anthropic’s lobbying is just the usual industry push for safety and oversight, or if it really crosses the line Sacks describes. To sort this out, someone would need to dig into the company’s disclosed lobbying activities and line them up with the timing of recent state initiatives.
Until then, the story feels more like a heated charge than a settled fact.
More in Business & Startups
Anthropic's AI store profits as CEO acknowledges eternal transcendence
Anthropic’s new AI storefront is finally turning a profit, a milestone that feels almost ceremonial...
Gnani.ai launches Vachana STT model as core IndiaAI infrastructure
Gnani.ai, the Bengaluru‑based speech‑technology firm, has just put its newest speech‑to‑text engine...
PC Company Invests in AI Engines, Context‑Aware Computing, Intelligence
A PC maker long known for assembling laptops and desktops is now positioning itself as a backbone...
Yann LeCun seeks EUR 500 M for AI start‑up valued at EUR 3 B; Alex LeBrun to step down
Yann LeCun is courting investors for a fresh AI venture that could bring in €500 million, pushing...
Threads aims for morning habit, citing 1998 NBA Finals‑style algorithm precision
Threads is betting that users will reach for their phones before coffee, hoping the app becomes the...
Common Questions Answered
What specific accusation does David Sacks make against Anthropic regarding regulation?
David Sacks accuses Anthropic of running a 'sophisticated regulatory capture strategy based on fear-mongering' that weaponizes regulation. He claims the company is using policy pressure to tilt the market in its favor, which harms startups in the AI ecosystem.
How does David Sacks claim Anthropic's regulatory strategy impacts startups?
Sacks alleges that Anthropic's regulatory tactics are 'damaging the startup ecosystem' by creating a state regulatory frenzy. He states that the company's approach harms startups through what he describes as weaponized regulation that favors established players.
What role does David Sacks hold in relation to this accusation against Anthropic?
David Sacks serves as Trump's AI adviser and is described as the White House 'AI czar' along with being a venture capitalist. He made these accusations against Anthropic in a post on the social media platform X, using his official position to amplify the claims.
What specific phrase does David Sacks use to describe Anthropic's regulatory approach?
Sacks characterizes Anthropic's strategy as a 'sophisticated regulatory capture strategy based on fear-mongering.' This phrase suggests he believes Anthropic is deliberately using fear tactics to influence regulation in ways that benefit the company competitively.