DeepEyesV2 Beats Larger Open‑Source Models by Leveraging Search Tools
When we ran the newest benchmark suite, a crowded mix of open-source language models faced off not just on raw facts but on juggling reasoning, planning and interaction. Historically, bigger has meant better - more parameters usually push scores higher on standard tests. The DeepEyesV2 paper, however, seems to turn that idea upside down, suggesting a slimmer design can actually beat bulkier rivals if it leans on external utilities instead of trying to store everything inside.
Researchers gave each model the same batch of multi-step prompts and logged how often the system managed to stitch together the three abilities without tripping. The data point to a surprising lever: tools that fetch and filter information on the fly. Whenever those helpers are in play, the gap between a modest model and a heavyweight shrinks dramatically, hinting that the next leap might come from smarter integration rather than bigger brains.
DeepEyesV2 also topped other open-source models on tasks that need all three capabilities to work together. The analysis found search tools, especially plain-text search, gave the biggest boost to accuracy. It appears many models still struggle to mean
But DeepEyesV2 outperformed other open-source models on tasks that require coordination across all three capabilities. The analysis also found that search tools play a major role in boosting accuracy, with text search providing the biggest gains. This suggests that many models still struggle to meaningfully incorporate information from visual search alone.
How tool use helps smaller models compete DeepEyesV2 shows its largest gains in specialized benchmarks. In mathematical reasoning tasks, it scored 52.7 percent on MathVerse, a 7.1-point improvement over its base model. The model also performs well on search-driven tasks.
It seems tool integration matters more than raw size, at least in the case of DeepEyesV2. By wiring together image analysis, code execution and a web-search module, the system beats larger open-source rivals. The Chinese team behind it quickly realized that pure reinforcement learning wasn’t giving stable multimodal tool use, so they switched to a more explicit orchestration strategy.
Once they told the model to call a text-search engine, accuracy jumped - a hint that external knowledge can make up for limited training data. Still, many models keep stumbling over basic meaning, which suggests there are gaps in how well different capabilities blend. That’s why DeepEyesV2’s edge feels tied to clever tool selection rather than sheer parameter count.
The results look encouraging, but I’m not sure the approach will scale to every domain, and pulling in search could add latency or consistency hiccups. This raises a bigger question: will future multimodal systems lean on built-in knowledge or keep leaning on outside resources? For now, the evidence leans toward the latter, though we’ll need more tests to be confident.
More in Research & Benchmarks
Notion’s simplified AI agent feature feels indispensable, says engineer
When Notion rolled out its new AI agent, most users treated it as a neat add‑on. For software...
DeepSeek's architectural fix improves large‑scale reasoning, follows GRPO work
Why does a tweak to a model’s architecture matter? DeepSeek just unveiled a change that nudges its...
Nested Learning's Continuum Memory System Redefines AI Memory for 2026
Enterprises are betting on AI that doesn’t forget. As models move from one‑off tasks to ongoing...
New framework lets agentic AI tools adapt to fill main agent knowledge gaps
Why does this matter? Agentic AI systems still stumble when the core model lacks the facts it needs...
Opera Neon: AI‑native browser that researches, compares prices, codes
Why does a browser need a brain? As the push for “agentic” tools gathers steam, the line between...
Common Questions Answered
How does DeepEyesV2 achieve higher accuracy than larger open‑source models?
DeepEyesV2 leverages external search tools, especially text‑search, to supplement its internal knowledge. By orchestrating image analysis, code execution, and web search, it compensates for its smaller parameter count and outperforms heftier rivals on coordination tasks.
What role do search tools play in the performance gains of DeepEyesV2?
The benchmark analysis shows that search tools, particularly text‑search, provide the biggest accuracy boost. Incorporating external information through these tools allows DeepEyesV2 to handle reasoning, planning, and interaction more effectively than models that rely solely on internal parameters.
Why did the Chinese research team shift from reinforcement learning to explicit tool orchestration?
They found that reinforcement learning alone failed to produce stable multimodal tool use, leading to inconsistent performance. Switching to explicit orchestration—directly instructing the model to invoke tools like a text‑search engine—resulted in noticeable accuracy improvements.
What does the DeepEyesV2 paper suggest about the importance of tool integration versus raw parameter count?
The paper argues that tool integration can outweigh raw parameter size, as DeepEyesV2 outperforms larger open‑source models by effectively coordinating external tools. This finding challenges the traditional assumption that bigger models automatically achieve better benchmark scores.