Editorial illustration for Anthropic unveils Claude constitution urging builders to ensure safety
Anthropic unveils Claude constitution urging builders to...
Anthropic unveils Claude constitution urging builders to ensure safety
Anthropic has rolled out a new “constitution” for its Claude models, framing the AI as a helpful, honest assistant that should never threaten humanity. The document, positioned as a manifesto rather than a technical spec, even touches on whether Claude possesses any form of consciousness or moral status—a line that has sparked debate among developers. While the guidelines lay out lofty principles, the company’s leadership stresses that the real test lies with those who integrate the model into products.
In the rollout announcement, Anthropic’s co‑founder Dario Askell underscored a shift away from expecting external regulators or third‑party auditors to shoulder safety concerns. He argued that the burden should sit squarely with the firms that build and deploy these systems, not be passed along elsewhere.
Askell said the company doesn't want to "put the onus on other people … It's actually the responsibility of the companies that are building and deploying these models to take on the burden."
Askell said the company doesn't want to "put the onus on other people … It's actually the responsibility of the companies that are building and deploying these models to take on the burden." Another part of the manifesto that stands out is the part about Claude's "consciousness" or "moral status." Anthropic says the doc "express[es] our uncertainty about whether Claude might have some kind of consciousness or moral status (either now or in the future)." It's a thorny subject that has sparked conversations and sounded alarm bells for people in a lot of different areas -- those concerned with "model welfare," those who believe they've discovered "emergent beings" inside chatbots, and those who have spiraled further into mental health struggles and even death after believing that a chatbot exhibits some form of consciousness or deep empathy.
Will a 57‑page constitution keep AI in check? Anthropic says the new Claude “constitution” is meant to embed helpfulness, honesty and a prohibition against harming humanity directly into the model’s core. The document, aimed at Claude rather than external audiences, spells out the company’s intended ethical character in detail.
A bold move. Yet how a model interprets a static text remains unclear. Askell emphasized that the burden shouldn't fall on third parties; developers deploying the system must shoulder responsibility themselves.
This shift suggests Anthropic is moving from passive guidelines to an active framework that developers must adopt. The manifesto even touches on Claude’s alleged “consciousness” and “moral status,” a notion that raises more questions than answers. Without independent verification, it is uncertain whether the constitution will translate into measurable safety improvements.
In practice, the effectiveness of such internal directives will depend on how rigorously they are enforced and audited by the companies that integrate Claude into their products.
Further Reading
- Anthropic releases 'Constitutional AI' to align Claude with human values - Anthropic
- Anthropic's Claude gets a constitution: How 'Constitutional AI' aims to make LLMs safer - TechCrunch
- Anthropic Unveils Constitutional AI Framework for Safer Language Models - The Verge
- Building Safer AI with Constitutional AI: Anthropic's Approach to Alignment - arXiv