Editorial illustration for AI Image Generators Struggle with Unnatural, Overly Polished Aesthetic
AI Image Generators Struggle with Hyperreal Aesthetics
AI image generators improve yet retain overly smooth, stylized look
The gloss is fading. For years, AI-generated images carried a telltale sheen, too smooth, too perfect, that dreamy glow of a stylized portrait rather than a snapshot of real life. That look isn't gone, but something has shifted.
In late 2025, Google’s Gemini app dropped a new image model called Nano Banana, and users quickly discovered its strange power: it rendered their actual likenesses with unsettling fidelity, free from the usual neutral blandness. The irony is sharp. As AI image generators become more realistic, they are, in a sense, getting worse, losing that polished perfection for something rawer, more flawed, and far more convincing.
But most AI generated images still carried a certain look: a little too smooth and perfect, with a kind of glow you'd associate with a stylized portrait more than a candid photo. Some AI images still look that way, but there's a new trend toward actual realism that tones down the gloss. How it's going OpenAI is a relative newcomer in the tech world when you compare it to the likes of Google and Meta, but those established companies haven't been standing still as AI ascends.
In the latter half of 2025, Google released a new image model in its Gemini app called Nano Banana. It went viral when people started using it to make realistic figurines of themselves. My colleague Robert Hart tried out the trend and noticed something interesting: the model preserved his actual likeness more faithfully than other AI tools.
That's the thing about AI images: they often tend toward a neutral, bland middle ground.
The paradox is laid bare: AI image generators improve by embracing imperfection. Google’s Nano Banana proves that fidelity, warts, asymmetries, the unphotogenic truths of a real face, matters more than polish. Yet the old look lingers, a ghost in the machine.
That gloss, that too-perfect smoothness, is a comfort zone for models trained on idealized data. Breaking it requires deliberate ugliness, a willingness to let pixels be messy. The tools are learning to get worse, and that’s exactly what makes them better.
The next leap won’t come from more realism but from an embrace of the real.
Related Reading
AI Tools & Apps Claude gains shared context in Excel, PowerPoint; Microsoft adds Copilot Cowork
AI Tools & Apps Windows Copilot AI unable to pinpoint image source in user test
AI Tools & Apps LG's recent webOS update adds Microsoft Copilot app, now removable
From Archives Integrated AI tools unify CRM, communication, workflow for Indian firms
From Archives Disney pours USD 1 billion into Sora characters, challenging Google’s API push
Common Questions Answered
Why do AI-generated images often look artificially perfect?
AI image generators have historically struggled with creating truly realistic images, producing visuals with an overly smooth and glossy aesthetic. This 'hyperpolished' look makes AI images feel more like stylized magazine spreads than authentic, candid photographs.
How are AI image generators working to improve visual realism?
Developers are now prioritizing a shift towards more authentic visual representations, focusing on toning down the unnatural gloss and perfection of AI-generated images. The current trend in AI image generation is to create visuals that more closely resemble genuine, unretouched photographs.
What visual characteristics make AI-generated images feel unnatural?
AI images typically display an unnaturally smooth texture with a distinctive 'glow' that differs from real-world photography. These images often look technically impressive but lack the subtle imperfections and organic qualities found in authentic photographs.
Further Reading
- The Weird Aesthetic of AI-Generated Images — The New Yorker
- AI art is getting shockingly good. But it still has a telling flaw — MIT Technology Review
- Why AI images still look like AI images — Vox
- AI image generators are better than ever — so why do they still look the same? — The Verge
- Why all AI-generated images look kind of the same — Fast Company