Editorial illustration for 90% of Salesforce engineers use Cursor daily, saying it filled senior gaps
Cursor AI: How Salesforce Engineers Solve Senior Skill Gaps
90% of Salesforce engineers use Cursor daily, saying it filled senior gaps
Ninety percent of Salesforce’s engineering team now opens Cursor each morning, making the tool a routine part of their workflow. The adoption rate suggests the platform is doing more than polishing code snippets; it’s becoming a de facto mentor for developers who lack on‑site guidance. While senior engineers traditionally shepherd newcomers through complex codebases, many of the company’s junior staff report that such hands‑on support is scarce.
In that vacuum, Cursor steps in, surfacing documentation, flagging patterns, and offering context that would otherwise require a senior colleague’s time. The result? Faster onboarding, fewer bottlenecks, and a noticeable lift in confidence among less‑experienced programmers.
As the team leans on the AI assistant to bridge knowledge gaps, the question becomes whether a tool can truly replace the nuanced explanations a seasoned engineer provides. That tension sets the stage for a candid observation from Appajodu, who notes how the software has reshaped the learning curve for those without senior mentors.
Cursor helped them catch up." Appajodu added that these junior engineers didn't have any "senior engineers sitting with them and explaining a lot of things". According to them, Cursor took their spot instead, and helped them better understand existing code so they could contribute more effectively. Furthermore, he stated that senior engineers initially used Cursor for tedious and repetitive tasks that were "inefficient to tackle manually".
Eventually, they expanded the use case quickly to higher-value tasks. "Adoption followed the same pattern across teams: a small group would try Cursor, see the impact, and the rest would follow. Within a few months, Cursor went from a new tool at Salesforce to one that nearly every single engineer at the company was using," Cursor added.
Last August, Salesforce revealed that a team within the company, which maintains the data infrastructure powering its sales AI agent, had integrated Cursor into its software development process.
Did the numbers tell the whole story? Over 20,000 Salesforce engineers now run Cursor every day, a figure that translates to more than nine‑tenths of the company's development staff. The tool’s adoption coincided with a reported 30 % lift in pull‑request velocity, suggesting a measurable shift in workflow speed.
According to SVP of engineering Shan Appajodu, the change is “0 to 1” in how developers use tools to improve product quality. He added that junior engineers, often without senior mentors nearby, leaned on Cursor to decode existing code and contribute more effectively. In that sense, the AI assistant appears to have filled a mentorship gap.
Yet the data stop at internal metrics; it remains unclear whether the boost reflects deeper code‑quality improvements or simply faster ticket turnover. Likewise, the long‑term impact on skill development for less‑experienced staff is not addressed. As Salesforce continues to embed Cursor, further evidence will be needed to gauge whether the early gains translate into sustained engineering outcomes.
Further Reading
- Product Hunt - AI Tools - Product Hunt
- There's An AI For That - TAAFT
Common Questions Answered
How has Cursor impacted junior engineers at Salesforce?
Cursor has effectively filled the mentorship gap for junior engineers who lack direct senior guidance. The tool helps junior developers better understand existing codebases and contribute more effectively, essentially acting as an AI-powered mentor that explains complex code and workflows.
What productivity improvements did Salesforce see after adopting Cursor?
Salesforce experienced a 30% lift in pull-request velocity after implementing Cursor across their engineering team. Over 90% of their 20,000 engineers now use the tool daily, suggesting a significant transformation in how developers approach coding and code review processes.
What did SVP of Engineering Shan Appajodu say about Cursor's impact?
Appajodu described Cursor's impact as a '0 to 1' change in how developers use tools to improve product quality. He noted that the tool has been particularly valuable for junior engineers who previously lacked direct senior mentorship and guidance.